[Zope-dev] Subversion

2004-05-03 Thread Chris Withers
(cross-posted to zope-dev too, seems relevent there ;-) Marius Gedminas wrote: BTW the Zope subversion conversion hit a snag due to line ending style on Windows. Apparently cvs2svn does not add the required svn:eol-style properties for text files, cvs2svn is a python script, surely you guys can

[Zope-dev] masimum number of mounted databases with APE?

2004-05-03 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
Hi, I am thinking of partitioning my ZODB quite a lot for both serving and packing performance reasons. What is the maximum number of recommended mounted ZODB's to use with DBTab? Thanks /dario -- -- --- Dario Lopez-Kästen, IT

[Zope-dev] How To run current Zope 2 3 from CVS on Windows

2004-05-03 Thread Max M
As I said, I would write a How-To in getting Zope 3 up and running on Windows, given the binaries that Tim has made. http://www.mxm.dk/papers/run-z3-cvs-wthout-compiler/ Feel free to comment. regards Max M ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Zope-dev] Re: masimum number of mounted databases with APE?

2004-05-03 Thread Tres Seaver
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: Hi, I am thinking of partitioning my ZODB quite a lot for both serving and packing performance reasons. What is the maximum number of recommended mounted ZODB's to use with DBTab? Hmmm, the Subject: header suggested that the question was about APE; I almost skipped

[Zope-dev] Re: maximum number of mounted databases with APE?

2004-05-03 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
Tres Seaver wrote: Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: Hi, I am thinking of partitioning my ZODB quite a lot for both serving and packing performance reasons. What is the maximum number of recommended mounted ZODB's to use with DBTab? Hmmm, the Subject: header suggested that the question was about

[Zope-dev] Re: maximum number of mounted databases with APE?

2004-05-03 Thread Tres Seaver
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: WRT DBTab: as of Zope 2.7, that product is obsolete: its functionality has been folded into Zope.Startup's processing of the config file. We have to use DBTab atm because we are still using 2.6.2 in production and we haven't tested 2.7 yet for

RE: [Zope-dev] How To run current Zope 2 3 from CVS on Windows

2004-05-03 Thread Tim Peters
[Max M] As I said, I would write a How-To in getting Zope 3 up and running on Windows, given the binaries that Tim has made. http://www.mxm.dk/papers/run-z3-cvs-wthout-compiler/ Feel free to comment. Nicely done! Thank you for doing this. ___

RE: [Zope-dev] Subversion

2004-05-03 Thread Tim Peters
[Chris Withers] ... There's a svn property you can set on a higher level folder in the repository that can control a mapping for file extensions to this property, IIRC. I am hazy on it but I know it's possible. If so, it's not documented. Perhaps you're thinking of the svn:ignore property?

Re: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread alangmead
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/02/2004 01:28:48 PM: Willi Langenberger wrote at 2004-5-2 17:10 +0200: What is NPTL? It stands for Native POSIX Thread Library It is a new threads subsystem that is included in Linux 2.6 that Red Hat has backported into their 2.4 kernels. It

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread Dieter Maurer
Tim Peters wrote at 2004-5-2 23:16 -0400: ... Suppose a thread dies while holding the GIL (Python's global interpreter lock). Will the GIL be released so that another thread (including the main thread) can continue? There's no general answer to that. I expect that under *most* platform

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

2004-05-03 Thread Ken Manheimer
Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think there needs to be another category named wontfix that doesn't imply that it will ever be fixed like deferred seems to. This category should also be selected in the default search settings. Later, Chris McDonough wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-30 at

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread alangmead
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/03/2004 01:48:57 PM: The reason why I believe Python is to blame: With Python 2.1.3, a SIGSEGV in one thread killed them all; with Python 2.3.3, a SIGSEGV in one thread kills one of them (the main thread, not the thread that got the

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread Tim Peters
[Dieter Maurer] The reason why I believe Python is to blame: Then this should really move to a Python bug tracker. With Python 2.1.3, a SIGSEGV in one thread killed them all; with Python 2.3.3, a SIGSEGV in one thread kills one of them (the main thread, not the thread that got the

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread alangmead
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/03/2004 03:47:31 PM: [Dieter Maurer] I'm not clear on exactly what blocked means. It has a very specific meaning with Unix signals. The kernel still has the signal for the process waiting in a queue, but the process has told the kernel that it is

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread Tim Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [... snip good explanations ...] In order to get LinuxThreads to support the Python's threading semantics, what probably needs to be done is to have PyThread_init_thread set all handlers to call kill(main_thread, sig) to signal the main thread. If someone cares enough to

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread alangmead
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/03/2004 04:41:08 PM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If someone cares enough to work up a patch, Python's patch tracker is open all night: http://sf.net/tracker/?atid=305470group_id=5470 I might be willing to try my hand at this, but I could use a tiny bit

RE: [Zope-dev] Segfault and Deadlock

2004-05-03 Thread Tim Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED], on special-casing LinuxThreads] I might be willing to try my hand at this, but I could use a tiny bit of guidance. (If you don't mind.) I don't mind wink, but I haven't run on Linux since 1994, and have lost track of how Unixish special-casing is done in Python since then.