Tres Seaver wrote:
+if set is None:
+set = IISet(())
+elif type(set) is IntType: # isinstance(set, int) for 2.8
How come isinstance is only to be used for 2.8?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
+if set is None:
+set = IISet(())
+elif type(set) is IntType: # isinstance(set, int) for
2.8
How come isinstance is only to be used for 2.8?
Hi,
when I wrote the patch and the test case I tried to
On May 30, 2005, at 20:39, Chad Whitacre wrote:
Thanks, that's what I figured. ;-)
IIRC the last time I did something like that (moving CMF to ZPL 2.1)
I wrote a python script to replace the text appropriately... sed
and awk are also good tools for that when you're good at shell
On May 30, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 30. Mai 2005 12:35:22 -0400 Chad Whitacre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear all,
I am wondering what mechanism the Zope team uses to manage the
copyright/license boilerplate at the top of every file. Is this
handled
manually or is
On 5/25/05, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you use the installProduct command of ZopeTestCase on a product
that has a CMFSetup profile you may get the following error:
File /home/zopes/27test/Products/CMFSetup/registry.py, line 567, in
registerProfile
raise KeyError,
[Andreas Jung]
Log message for revision 30558:
- Collector #1323: applied patch to fix umask problem in zdctl
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/zdaemon/zdctl.py
Andreas, Zope doesn't own zdaemon. zdaemon is (so far) *copied*
into Zope from
[Andreas Jung]
I thought Fred hooked zdaemon and ZConfig already as external definition.
But apparently this happened only for ZConfig.
That's correct; nothing about zdaemon has changed yet. Back on 13 May:
[me]
The first time ZConfig and zdaemon get tagged, it's important that
whoever do
