Geoff Davis wrote:
No, I think I understood you. I was being sloppy in my use of language.
I should have said something more like Zope 3 then becomes an application
server built around the Zed library.
Or Zed is the part of Zope that can be used without Zope.
--
hilsen/regards Max M,
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Sounds like the original vision of Zope 3 without the X. I thought we
never got around to developing this stuff the last time.
Actually, no. We originally said that we would provide a transition
path. I said over and over that this was *not*
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
I think that having one name for two radically different, though related,
things is very confusing. There are really
2 main technologies that people care about:
1. The Zope app server. This is characterized by things like an object
file system, through-the-web
On Mar 3, 2006, at 3:08 AM, Max M wrote:
Splitting up Zope to let people use seperate pieces of Zope aka Zed
is not a valid reason. Good software practise is a valid reason.
But catering for those few developers that wants to use just a few
pieces is probably not worth the effort.
Here's
[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]:
It's not about sacrificing the Zope-the-app-server brand. It's actually
about growing it in the sense that it becomes much clearer WHAT THE HELL
Zope actually is. Or can you explain what Zope is in one sentence?
But it all comes down to the depths (or
Andreas Jung wrote:
I think one needs to be Manager to upload content to the Products area
on zope.org. I would give the new window maintainer a local Manager role
in this case...so who is willing to care about the future Windows build?
I would like to see a longer commitment for this job.
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| OK, are either you (or anyone else at Enfold) or Tim going to roll the
| 2.9.1 binary or would you like me to pick it up from now on?
Can't promise anything about 2.9.1. It might happen later on though.
I'm happy to pick this up, just gimme the nod!
Chris
--
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:34:49PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| | OK, are either you (or anyone else at Enfold) or Tim going to roll the
| | 2.9.1 binary or would you like me to pick it up from now on?
|
| Can't promise anything about 2.9.1. It might happen later on
Zope Consultant, NYC
My NYC client needs help understanding modifying a Zope-based CMS that was
previously built for their client
My client would prefer the candidate to work on-site, but it’s not mandatory;
however, a face-2-face interview is required. Local candidates need only apply
Cool, I'll try and get the builds done on Monday, will report back with
any problems...
How should I run all the Zope tests once I have a candidate build?
cheers,
Chris
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:34:49PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| | OK, are
[Chris Withers]
...
How should I run all the Zope tests once I have a candidate build?
Section Testing Zope in
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/inst/WinBuilders/README.txt
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Strange how (most of) the Plone people seem to be so quick in willing to
sacrifice the Zope brand :(
In out world Zope doesn't have a brand. Plone has a it. Most of our
customers doesn't have a clue as to what Zope is.
As far as I can tell, Zope is a developers
Benji York wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Good point. There's the question: Does this zed thing need a different
name at all? If we want other people to pick it up, then it seems like a
good idea to distinguish it from Zope-the-app-server. Paul seems to
suggest that in his response.
13 matches
Mail list logo
