Previously Jim Fulton wrote:
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+1
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Oct 5 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Sat Oct 6 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Fri Oct 5 20:54:37 EDT 2007
Andreas Jung wrote:
we want to get rid of the term Zope 3 in the future
That's news to me. Perhaps for some definition of we.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
--On 6. Oktober 2007 08:14:10 -0400 Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
we want to get rid of the term Zope 3 in the future
The confusion for people with the terms and Zope 2 and Zope 3 was
one of major topics of the last german Zope conference. And there
were also
I agree with you Roger. I want things to stay as they are for the same
reasons. I have great respect for Zope 2 developers however there there
are two development paradigms at play that are fundamentally
incompatible despite the inclusion of component architecture in Zope 2.
Regards,
David
--On 6. Oktober 2007 12:03:06 -0300 David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agree with you Roger. I want things to stay as they are for the same
reasons. I have great respect for Zope 2 developers however there there
are two development paradigms at play that are fundamentally incompatible
Hi.
Zope 2 currently emits deprecation warnings about old-style event
methods in OFS, for example manage_afterAdd and manage_beforeDelete.
The deprecation warning states that these methods won't be called
anymore in Zope 2.11.
I would like to turn this deprecation warning into a discouraged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Oct 2007, at 17:20, Andreas Jung wrote:
The distinction between Zope 2 and Zope 3 must disappear. We must
speak of Zope. Everything else is counterproductive when it comes
to promoting Zope. There is only one Zope developer community and
Hi Andreas
What do you man by two development paradigms?
Please don't build a wall between Zope 2 and Zope 3
developers. Most old-school Zope 2 developers are doing
development also with Zope 3 components and Zope 3
techniques. Look at Plone 3.0 and its heavy usage of Zope 3
--On 6. Oktober 2007 18:24:45 +0200 Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andreas
What do you man by two development paradigms?
Please don't build a wall between Zope 2 and Zope 3
developers. Most old-school Zope 2 developers are doing
development also with Zope 3 components and Zope
--On 6. Oktober 2007 18:07:51 +0200 Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi.
Zope 2 currently emits deprecation warnings about old-style event
methods in OFS, for example manage_afterAdd and manage_beforeDelete.
The deprecation warning states that these methods won't be called
On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:14, Andreas Jung wrote:
You are using 7 times the term Zope2 and 9 times Zope 3
and also Plone 3.0 in this small text. Can you try to describe
this without 2 or 3 in Zope *? I guess not, right?
s/Zope 2/Zope application server
s/Zope 3/Zope components
I
--On 6. Oktober 2007 13:40:46 -0400 Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although you are a Zope component-only developer
you can not ignore the dependent applications and framework.
So you are saying I have to change Zope 3's story to cope with Zope 2's
identity crisis?
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-10-6 17:20 +0200:
...
The distinction between Zope 2 and Zope 3 must disappear. We must speak of
Zope. Everything else is counterproductive when it comes to promoting
Zope. There is only one Zope developer community and most of us have a Zope
2 and a Zope 3 hat on
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:14, Andreas Jung wrote:
You are using 7 times the term Zope2 and 9 times Zope 3
and also Plone 3.0 in this small text. Can you try to describe
this without 2 or 3 in Zope *? I guess not, right?
s/Zope 2/Zope application server
s/Zope 3/Zope
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:14, Andreas Jung wrote:
You are using 7 times the term Zope2 and 9 times Zope 3
and also Plone 3.0 in this small text. Can you try to describe
this without 2 or 3 in Zope *? I guess not, right?
s/Zope 2/Zope application server
s/Zope 3/Zope
Hi Andreas. Let me say I see the development paradigms as being the
following without prejudice to any application that depends upon zope 3.
Respectfully, no one is building walls. my contribution to the
discussion is not about isolating folks but of the reality of the
software differences.
--On 7. Oktober 2007 01:46:50 -0300 David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andreas. Let me say I see the development paradigms as being the
following without prejudice to any application that depends upon zope 3.
Respectfully, no one is building walls. my contribution to the discussion
is
18 matches
Mail list logo
