On 10/6/07, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While event subscribers are certainly nicer, I don't see any realistic
chance of refactoring all code in larger projects (like CMF and Plone)
to move to events entirely in the next months or even years.
No even years? Because there will be
Previously Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 10/6/07, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While event subscribers are certainly nicer, I don't see any realistic
chance of refactoring all code in larger projects (like CMF and Plone)
to move to events entirely in the next months or even years.
On 10/9/07, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plone 3.0 needs Zope 2.10.3, anything earlier does not work.
Oh, I thought the idea was to always support two Zope versions? I'm
happy to hear that this isn't the case.
--
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Oct 8 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Oct 9 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Mon Oct 8 20:52:26 EDT 2007
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 10/9/07, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plone 3.0 needs Zope 2.10.3, anything earlier does not work.
Oh, I thought the idea was to always support two Zope versions? I'm
happy to hear that this isn't the case.
For 3.0 we needed the improved local
