On 2009-11-24 05:57, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I whole-heartedly agree, and I think it's important that we use the
momentum behind BFG (and other consumers of the ZTK) to drive the ZTK
forward. Anything else would be stupid.
I don't think BFG can be considered to be a 'consumer of the ZTK'. It
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Matthew Wilkes
matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
But, here is where the ZCA eyes come back into play, I wouldn't add
this to the ZCA itself. One reason being that Hanno's been working on
a more useful persistent component root for Zope that brings in bits
of
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I'm not sure how this affects Chris proposal. But we already have a
commonly used subclass of the component registry that uses the dict
API in a somewhat different way here.
Thanks for the explanation Hanno, fair enough. five.localsitemanager peed in
this API pool
Chris McDonough wrote:
Except at this point we've lost all the other ZCA stuff. You can't
override with a local utility, for example.
I see. I didn't understand that this was a use case, because I don't use any
persistent registries. If you say this is a use case, I believe it.
Note
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I *do* actually like the named IAnonymousUtility thing as a
convenience, because it retains some consistency. Maybe it's slower,
which would be a negative. But it also allows all the other ZCA stuff
(overriding, introspection, global/local variants, etc) and API: we're
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
Except at this point we've lost all the other ZCA stuff. You can't
override with a local utility, for example.
I see. I didn't understand that this was a use case, because I don't use
any
persistent registries. If you say this is a use case,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Nov 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Nov 23 20:43:55 EST 2009
URL:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
I think we have to divorce the requirement from the ZCA.
The requirement:
- an attribute of an instance of the class
zope.component.registry.Components which is dictionarylike
(accepts any key type, any value
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Chris McDonough wrote:
Off the top of my head, another way to think of this might be to say
that the 'dict access' is basically looking up a named utility
providing a very generic marker interface, e.g.
zope.component.interfaces.IUtility or even just
I'd like to see the hard dependency of zope.dublincore on zope.annotation
gone. This would lift the indirect dependency on the ZODB.
zope.dublincore uses zope.annotation in three places:
- For defining the IZopeDublinCoreAnnotatable marker interface which isn't
used in any of the packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I *do* actually like the named IAnonymousUtility thing as a
convenience, because it retains some consistency. Maybe it's slower,
which would be a negative. But it also allows all the other ZCA stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2009-11-24 05:57, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I whole-heartedly agree, and I think it's important that we use the
momentum behind BFG (and other consumers of the ZTK) to drive the ZTK
forward. Anything else would be stupid.
On 2009-11-24 17:26, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2009-11-24 05:57, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I whole-heartedly agree, and I think it's important that we use the
momentum behind BFG (and other consumers of the ZTK) to drive the ZTK
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Chris McDonough wrote:
Off the top of my head, another way to think of this might be to say
that the 'dict access' is basically looking up a named utility
providing a very generic marker interface, e.g.
zope.component.interfaces.IUtility or
Hi,
In my Zope3 (I use Zope 3.4.0) logs I just found some curious entries:
-- snip ---
2009-10-23T12:20:41 INFO root pid 21278: terminated by SIGSEGV
--
2009-10-23T12:20:41 INFO root spawned process pid=1502
--
2009-10-23T12:21:12 INFO
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Hermann Himmelbauer du...@qwer.tk wrote:
This occurs once in a while, so it seems something segfaults and the server
seems to notice that and restarts.
Any clue what to do about this?
If you're using a version of zope.security less than 3.7.1, I would
suspect
Could somebody please give me PyPI rights for zope.browserresource? I'd
like to release a new version of it which includes the recent fixes to its
dependencies. Thank you very much.
--
Thomas
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Chris McDonough wrote:
I think it makes sense. If we can relax the utility name must be a string
restriction it would be the best solution I think.
I'll see what I can do.
I've decided to keep the components subclass which inherits from dict.
- C
Chris McDonough wrote:
I think we have to divorce the requirement from the ZCA.
The requirement:
- an attribute of an instance of the class
zope.component.registry.Components which is dictionarylike
(accepts any key type, any value type).
If I can get that, I'd be happy,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
I think we have to divorce the requirement from the ZCA.
The requirement:
- an attribute of an instance of the class
zope.component.registry.Components which is dictionarylike
(accepts any key type, any value type).
If I can get that,
Chris McDonough wrote:
I fear it was for naught, sorry.
Adding an attribute is unsightly and turning this into a component problem
doesn't have enough immediate gain. The BFG registry will just continue to
be
a dict subclass.
If Zope folks later want to use libraries that come from
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
I fear it was for naught, sorry.
Adding an attribute is unsightly and turning this into a component problem
doesn't have enough immediate gain. The BFG registry will just continue to
be
a dict subclass.
If Zope folks later want to use
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Thomas Lotze wrote:
Could somebody please give me PyPI rights for zope.browserresource? I'd
like to release a new version of it which includes the recent fixes to its
dependencies. Thank you very much.
I am in the process of making you
Am Dienstag 24 November 2009 22:12:00 schrieb Benji York:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Hermann Himmelbauer du...@qwer.tk wrote:
This occurs once in a while, so it seems something segfaults and the
server seems to notice that and restarts.
Any clue what to do about this?
If you're
24 matches
Mail list logo
