Hello Marius,
Wednesday, March 31, 2010, 2:50:33 PM, you wrote:
...
MG * look at other possible bugfix upgrades, see if there are any
MGimportant bugs fixed (zope.release's bin/list-latest is useful here)
...
I created a sheet with versions
Hello,
As discussed at the weekly meeting, we're planning a BugDay.
The wiki page is here:
http://wiki.zope.org/bluebream/BugDaysList
Don't wonder, we're planning it together with BB.
Feel free to add your inputs.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZER
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
o Run the automated fixups::
$ /path/to/zrp/bin/zope-org-fix-project .
...list of automated fixups ...
Just in case *someone* cares:
zope-org-fix-project was written for copyright headers with a specific
layout. Depending on the actual layout it
On 04/09/2010 12:36 PM, yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
o Run the automated fixups::
$ /path/to/zrp/bin/zope-org-fix-project .
...list of automated fixups ...
Just in case *someone* cares:
zope-org-fix-project was written for copyright headers with a specific
On 04/09/2010 12:24 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
As discussed at the weekly meeting, we're planning a BugDay.
Cool. Somewhat sad it's a Saturday, but I'll make it somehow. :)
Christian
--
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) ·
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Apr 8 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Fri Apr 9 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Apr 8 21:29:36 EDT 2010
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
o Run the automated fixups::
$ /path/to/zrp/bin/zope-org-fix-project .
...list of automated fixups ...
Just in case *someone* cares:
zope-org-fix-project was written for copyright
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
On 04/08/2010 12:59 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:56:18AM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
On 04/08/2010 04:27 AM,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com wrote:
Setting the ZF as maintainer appears sufficient to appease the policy checker.
Or not. The fixer script won't edit this, but the checker script will
still whine about it.
Changing the author to the ZF really isn't a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
Log message for revision 110702:
correct metadata: I really did write this.
Setting the ZF as maintainer appears sufficient to appease the policy
checker.
Hmm, that doesn't work for me:
$ svn co $ZSVN/ZConfig/trunk
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how
to write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well.
In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as
maintainer, it's
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
We currently use it for 5 very similar sites that share one repository
but use 5 checkouts of it:
base.cfg
[buildout]
parts = instance
develop = ...
eggs = ...
zcml = ...
[instance]
...
site-1.cfg
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
So depending on a layout difference (line break or not) it produces
copyright headers with different content.
Doesn't make any sense to me, but the people I already asked don't care.
The All Rights Reserved is a little senseless,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect
the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.
+1
--
Benji York
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On 4/8/10 8:30 PM, Jan Smith wrote:
I've published the irc meeting summaries on the Australian OzZope site
- it also has an rss feed available.
http://www.ozzope.org/weekly-zope-development-meeting
Could this be added to planetzope.org ? The planet's feed is also announced on
#zope.
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to
write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well.
In particular, while it
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:15:22PM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Right. However, any calls to provideAdapter() and friends would still
use the global registry, unless I monkey patch
zope.component.globalregistry.base, as would any ZCML
17 matches
Mail list logo
