On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
>> It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to
>> write the code which tests that.
> See my later follow-up as well.
> In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as
> maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either. Why
> shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok
> packages, with an appropriate email? That seems preferable to me.
> I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect
> the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.
Why was the check for author even included in the checker/fixer scripts?
Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws or a policy document that
I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -