On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: >> It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to >> write the code which tests that. > > See my later follow-up as well. > > In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as > maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either. Why > shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok > packages, with an appropriate email? That seems preferable to me. > > I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect > the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.
Why was the check for author even included in the checker/fixer scripts? Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws or a policy document that requires this? I cannot find this in a contributor agreement. Zvezdan _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )