On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
>> It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to 
>> write the code which tests that.
> See my later follow-up as well.
> In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as
> maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either.  Why
> shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok
> packages, with an appropriate email?  That seems preferable to me.
> I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect
> the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.

Why was the check for author even included in the checker/fixer scripts?
Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws or a policy document that 
requires this?

I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.


Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to