Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp set though and nobody who steps up to fix
them.
Apart from that, we have made a promise to support Python 2.4 up to
2.6 for the ZTK 1.0
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What do others think about this?
Based on what you wrote, I think this is the right solution. Python 2.4 is
clearly important to the Zope 2 / Plone world.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What do others think about this?
Based on what you wrote, I think this is the right solution. Python 2.4 is
clearly important to the Zope 2 / Plone world.
Am 13.07.2010, 14:12 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
What do others think about this?
Hanno,
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
From your previous mail there were three packages with test failures on
2.7. But I thought these were fixed?
I fixed all of those and released
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting
those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail with more failures? I
On 07/13/2010 02:12 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Given all of these, I'm leaning towards not supporting Python 2.7 for
a ZTK 1.0 release. A 1.1 can drop Python 2.4 support and we can try to
support 2.7 in addition.
+1
For Zope standards we'd still be very fast with supporting Python 2.7 if
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Given all of these, I'm leaning towards not supporting Python 2.7 for
a ZTK 1.0 release. A 1.1 can drop Python 2.4 support and we can try to
support 2.7 in addition.
We discussed this in todays zope-dev IRC meeting.
On 2010-07-13 14:12:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting said:
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp set though and nobody who steps up to fix
them.
Apart from that, we have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2010-07-13 14:12:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting said:
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp
On 2010-07-13 20:37:42 +0200, Tres Seaver said:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2010-07-13 14:12:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting said:
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it.
Am 13.07.2010, 20:48 Uhr, schrieb Christian Zagrodnick c...@gocept.com:
Actually I was thinking about the individual packages. I assume
dropping Python 2.4 should bump the respective package version at least
from 1.x.y to 1.x+1.0, right?
ZTK 1.1 will officially not support Python 2.6 but it
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 13.07.2010, 20:48 Uhr, schrieb Christian Zagrodnick c...@gocept.com:
Actually I was thinking about the individual packages. I assume
dropping Python 2.4 should bump the respective package version at least
from 1.x.y to
15 matches
Mail list logo
