On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Okay, I'll take another look then and look at ObjectRef. Ah, yes, Dan
pointed out to you that you are using a zope.schema.Field in a class
instead of in a schema (an interface). That isn't right, and since the
direct use of that
Hey,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Tim Cook timothywayne.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Okay, I'll take another look then and look at ObjectRef. Ah, yes, Dan
pointed out to you that you are using a zope.schema.Field in a class
instead of
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:55 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I don't think a wiki page with a chronicle is necessary or even
helpful; you need to give us the information necessary to find the
bug, but no distracting surrounding information.
Okay.
To debug this
problem, a developer will need
Tim Cook wrote:
I would also like for you to explain just what it is about my attitude
that you find so offensive/problematic?
As a general rule of thumb, anyone who posts with more than on
exlamation mark is likely on the wrong track.
Cross posting to several lists is also a bit of a
Hey,
To debug this
problem, a developer will need the smallest possible example of code
that demonstrates the problem. That means, I take it, just 2 schemas
and a single form. Describe briefly what you expect to happen and what
in fact happens. If that example can be done *without*
Thanks for all the assistance.
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Yes, you do create new schema fields by subclassing from Field.
It's just that we saw you putting a field not in a schema but in what
looked like a concrete object.
This has given me a BIG pause while
Hi Tim,
Tim Cook schrieb:
Thanks for all the assistance.
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Yes, you do create new schema fields by subclassing from Field.
It's just that we saw you putting a field not in a schema but in what
looked like a concrete object.
Hi Shane,
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:10 -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Sorry, but the patch doesn't make any sense. Your version of
_validate_fields quietly skips validation entirely by default.
First of all that is why I asked for others to look at it. :-)
But I DID test it by inserting an
Thanks All,
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Carsten Senger wrote:
Sure you can have specialized fields that subclass from Field, TextLine,
or another base class. E.g. RegistrationNumber(TextLine) that takes care
to validate the input for a special format. But you use them in an
Tim Cook wrote:
I DID submit a patch suggestion in the Launchpad bug report.
I think you're talking about this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/301226
Sorry, but the patch doesn't make any sense. Your version of
_validate_fields quietly skips validation entirely by default. Why
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 11:05 +, Chris Withers wrote:
I can't. The testrunner is already there and buildout-based development
makes it trivial to run. svn already does the patch creation for you:
$ svn diff
be able to get past that bit. Perhaps a kind Zope dev will pick up on
this.
Hi there,
Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 11:05 +, Chris Withers wrote:
[snip]
So again, referring to the subject line. What are the next steps?
I am trying to understand the history of the discussion, which has a lot
of text and is widespread.
I think Dan Korostelev tried
Hedley Roos wrote:
Chris mentioned unit tests. You do not have to write a new unit test.
What is required is to have a look at the tests and then identify one
that is relevant to your problematic method. This test should be very
easy to read. The hard part is for you to expand this test to
Hi Tim
I'm more involved with Plone but can provide a slightly more
digestible answer :)
Chris mentioned unit tests. You do not have to write a new unit test.
What is required is to have a look at the tests and then identify one
that is relevant to your problematic method. This test should be
Tim Cook wrote at 2008-12-18 08:35 -0200:
...
Yeah we use the really cool, robust, well tested and trusted
application server called the Zope Component Architecture because it
really shows the strengths of the open source development process. Oh,
by the way, after everything is installed you
Thanks Dieter,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 19:41 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
I often approach situations like this with so called Monkey Patches:
I replace or enhance classes or methods during startup (triggered
by some startup event).
This may not be optimal but allows me to solve my problems
Hi All,
I have had an issue on the table for months. I started a dialog about
it here:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-users/2008-October/008215.html
The thread was interesting, helpful and did lead me to find an error in
some schema definitions because of a misunderstanding of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
