[Zope-dev] Re: AQ-Parent branch test failues was: Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: In my opinion, the fact that it accidentally worked as an instance variable isn't a very strong argument for continuing to support it. To me, this is a prime example of misusing a Five

[Zope-dev] Re: AQ-Parent branch test failues was: Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-16 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Thanks for looking into this, Hanno! Here's my feedback: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: I kept my promise and added the simple tests for the first two issues I found while doing testing against Plone. I have meanwhile fixed the first trivial issue (conflicting argument

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: AQ-Parent branch test failues was: Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-16 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: ViewPageTemplateFile etc. are only meant to be used as class attributes, never as instance attributes. This statement is also true for the current, acquisition-based one from Five. Is that documented anywhere? I can't seem to find any interface or

[Zope-dev] Re: AQ-Parent branch test failues was: Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-16 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: ViewPageTemplateFile etc. are only meant to be used as class attributes, never as instance attributes. This statement is also true for the current, acquisition-based one from Five. Is that documented anywhere? I can't seem