Re: [Zope-dev] Re: AW: AW: Re: Grok 0.11 released!

2007-11-10 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 09 November 2007, Martin Aspeli wrote: Surely there must be a way to say I want to use THAT KGS over there. Except for this module, that should hav this version. And of course, all these bunch of eggs which isn't dfined in that KGS at all. Unfortunately, this is not how the

[Zope-dev] Re: AW: AW: Re: Grok 0.11 released!

2007-11-09 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Roger Ineichen wrote: Before KGS there was no concept for keep the eggs in sync. Each project has to do it by itself. KGS at least is something that helps to manage the zope eggs. Everything outside this has to be done by the release manager of the project. And before the KGS, the cheesshop

[Zope-dev] Re: AW: AW: Re: Grok 0.11 released!

2007-11-09 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: I think we're now quite aware of that problem. Hence we need the KGS. But I'm questioning the implementation using a locked down index. What's the alternative? Nailing versions is not it for me, which by the way you can do with

[Zope-dev] Re: AW: AW: Re: Grok 0.11 released!

2007-11-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
Stephan Richter wrote: On Friday 09 November 2007, Lennart Regebro wrote: On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Create our own locked down index? I think so because, Surely there must be a way to say I want to use THAT KGS over there. Except for this module, that