Hi,
Why not use the tag you just made?
ZODB svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/tags/3.6.0/src/ZODB
etc.
(Hi have a vague feeling this may have been discussed before but I'm not
sure ;)).
Florent
Tim Peters wrote:
Log message for revision 41156:
Move to ZODB 3.6 final.
Changed:
[Florent Guillaume]
Why not use the tag you just made?
ZODB svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/tags/3.6.0/src/ZODB
etc.
Ask Jim ;-)
(Hi have a vague feeling this may have been discussed before but I'm not
sure ;)).
I'm not sure it's been coherently discussed on a mailing list:
- While
Tim Peters wrote:
[Florent Guillaume]
Why not use the tag you just made?
ZODB svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/tags/3.6.0/src/ZODB
etc.
Ask Jim ;-)
I don't like using tags in externals. Each time an external is changed to a
tag,
svn creates .OLD directories and gets a new version.
--On 6. Januar 2006 10:49:29 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like using tags in externals. Each time an external is changed
to a tag,
svn creates .OLD directories and gets a new version. It's a real hassle
IMO.
I _like_ tags in externals because they are self-documenting.
[Andreas Jung]
I _like_ tags in externals because they are self-documenting. Dealing with
externals where you have several different revision numbers is a PIA since
you never know what version of a module is behind the revision. You always
have look through the log for the referenced