Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:10:19PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm on the fence on this one. I think as long as the site *says* it's
affiliated with the Zope project, the Zope community and the
foundation, we're fine. You can argue both directions here: we might
Kent Tenney wrote:
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribution-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/
(http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
Very interesting. I hadn't seen that. I wonder *how* it is using
buildout's machinery.
Regards,
Martijn
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Kent Tenney wrote:
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribution-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/
(http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
Very interesting. I hadn't seen that. I wonder *how* it is using
buildout's machinery.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
You Can Save Buildout!
So, who is up to make a nice clean looking website and a few tutorials
for buildout? It needs a website. Buildout has been around for a few
years without a proper website already, Paver for 5 minutes and it's got
one. I'm not going to do it, but
The Paver site seems based on the doc generation thing that the new docs on
python.org use.
Sphinx is the doc generation thing, it's really nice, takes ReST files and
creates TOC, indexes, provides search, all from an attractive front page.
If a tiny bit of markup was added to the existing
