On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 07:14 Europe/Paris, Andy McKay wrote:
I smell commecial interest here. I smell people trying to make
that
one
killer project hoping to make it big, instead of centering around the
one
vehicle that will help make a bunch of projects big someday.
I won't
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 10:51 Europe/Paris, James Johnson wrote:
Please don't get me wrong, products like squishdot, CMFZen, and
others have steered me towards Zope. They are fine examples of the
things that make Zope appealing. But if you really think about what
I'm saying you
Hi Ropas-Zopas,
Just my 2 cents. I like plone and everything, but should'nt even the plone
developers be working on improving and making ZPT faster? Seems to me in
their rush to make this Plone product, they say they will make it compatible
and faster, but I'm appalled, Yes I said it :-)
Hi James.
Firstly lets address your subject. ZopeZen.org is slower. Why is that?
- There is a lot more work being done to render a page in Plone
- There is less caching being done, I havent optimized it as much as the old
site was
- The BSD memory leak in Python 2.1.3 is not helping
- More
Thanks for you kind explanation. I may have been premature in my
assessment the new Zopezen.org.
Well the proof is the in the pudding, give me a bit of time and we'll see.
But with some good people switching channels,
will Zope still end up a major player in the market?
Unfortunately