Leonardo Rochael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Syver,
Please add this issue to the Collector, including the test (prefereably
without the twisted bits)
Eh, what is the Collector?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Leonardo Rochael Almeida]
Please add this issue to the Collector, including the test
(prefereably without the twisted bits)
[Syver Enstad]
Eh, what is the Collector?
The zope.org Collectors are here:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/
and you want the Zope Collector:
Hi Syver,
Please add this issue to the Collector, including the test (prefereably
without the twisted bits)
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:57, Syver Enstad wrote:
[...]
I have a strange case here with ReadConflictErrors. I don't know if
this is covered already but anyway. I am using ZODB 3.2 so
I've used the cache_size paramter to the constructor of the DB to good
effect. Are there any further gotchas for ensuring that the ZODB stays
in memory as much as possible?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 22 April 2004 10:42, Syver Enstad wrote:
I've used the cache_size paramter to the constructor of the DB to good
effect. Are there any further gotchas for ensuring that the ZODB stays
in memory as much as possible?
Memory usage scales proportional to the number of threads. Reducing
Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 22 April 2004 10:42, Syver Enstad wrote:
I've used the cache_size paramter to the constructor of the DB to good
effect. Are there any further gotchas for ensuring that the ZODB stays
in memory as much as possible?
Memory usage scales
On Thursday 22 April 2004 11:43, Syver Enstad wrote:
cache_deactivate_after sounds interesting. Since I am running ZODB in
a web server I don't want the data to timeout and disappear from
memory since every object I have should be loaded at all times.
Thats why ZODB ignores that parameter now
Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 22 April 2004 11:43, Syver Enstad wrote:
cache_deactivate_after sounds interesting. Since I am running ZODB in
a web server I don't want the data to timeout and disappear from
memory since every object I have should be loaded at all
