Charles Y. Choi wrote:
With ZMI, you can create different methods/objects and then edit them.
The problem is that pretty much every other editor out there doesn't
know a whit about the types of objects/methods they are creating.
Does emacs really know the difference between a python method,
Chris Withers wrote:
Charles Y. Choi wrote:
With ZMI, you can create different methods/objects and then edit them.
The problem is that pretty much every other editor out there doesn't
know a whit about the types of objects/methods they are creating.
Does emacs really know the difference between
Charles Y. Choi wrote:
Yes, and though your PUT_factory override is a great thing, it's an
unsupported patch: that is,
it's not part of the standard packaging of Zope.
Urm, PUT_factory has been a standard part of Zope for some time now...
The conventions you
use (# for PythonScripts)
ZClasses are a waste of time, even more so than DTML.
Words of comfort. :^) Nice never having spent the time to learn 'em.
I've not experienced any bugs in ZPT when used in a sane context.
Same here, after several months' usage.
--
Two witches watch two watches. Which witch watched which
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Charles Y. Choi wrote:
IMHO, much of what makes the ZMI difficult to use is due to limitations
of the
textarea widget in a web browser (no syntax highlighting, no indentation
support,
etc.)
So what if there was a way to get JavaScript to take the contents of a
What you are likely to see in Zope3 at least is the ability to synch
objects to and from the filesystem. This would allow you to edit
content/code (code-tent?) on the filesystem using your choice of tools
and then check it back into the ZODB.
Another reason for this is a vision of having all
On 4/8/02 1:17 PM, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is wrong with editing the files trough FTP / WebDAV? I've mounted a
complete zopedatabase on a directory, and you can edit all files with
your favorite editor. Why wanting such editing posibilities in a easy to
use , in
At 12:43 PM 4/8/02 -0700, Charles Y. Choi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far, the best folks have been
able to come up with has been to use filenname
extensions
Are you referring to the
Object
Type Assocation And Death To index_html planned for Zope
2.6?
That document proposes, to add a
