Should be "how I was acquired" not required. Duh.
--
Andy McKay.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy McKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 6:26 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] getPhysicalPath?
> getPhysicalPath returns the physical path to an object ig
getPhysicalPath returns the physical path to an object ignoring how I got
there through Acquistion. There are a bunch of variables in the REQUEST that
tell me how I got to an object, but we have an object that is messing around
with traversal, so the REQUEST variables arent ideal.
Is there a simp
Hi,
I'm writing a python product containing around 40-50 modules, each
one with some dtml files. At the moment I got all the modules .py
files in the product directory, and a www directory with
subdirectories for each module.
Products
| -- MyProduct
|-- Module1.py
|--
I just upgraded my site explicit ZCatalog objects using Chris's very
helpful http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/HowTos/UpgradeToNewCatalog
instructions - but I have a bunch of catalog aware zclasses and some
zclasses which (eg zdiscussions things, based on ZDBase) use
Products.ZCatalog - given tha
What is the diference between ZODBC and ZmxODBC ? Which one is better?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Bryan Baszczewski
Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de março de 2001 18:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope-dev] SQL Server ..?
I am curious
The API hasn't changed, so they should be fine, though it really depends to
what extent the overridden methods in your code modify behavior.
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Lazarus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 8:02 PM
> Catalog doesn't take the Vocabulary object itself as an argument. It
> takes the (string) id of an acquirable Vocabulary. If you don't specify
> a string, it creates a standard non-globbing lexicon (Although a
> ZCatalog creates a globbing lexicon, go figure). Something like this
> should work (
Casey Duncan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I tried both
> >
> >my_catalog = Catalog(GlobbingLexicon())
> >
> > and
> >
> >my_catalog = Catalog(Vocabulary(globbing=1))
> >
> > and neither resulted in any calls to any GlobbingLexicon methods!
> >
> > Richard
> >
>
> Catalog
I had fixed zformulator to work with 2.2.4, haven't checked against 2.3
though.
Get this at http://teyc.editthispage.com/filedownloads
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or H
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I tried both
>
>my_catalog = Catalog(GlobbingLexicon())
>
> and
>
>my_catalog = Catalog(Vocabulary(globbing=1))
>
> and neither resulted in any calls to any GlobbingLexicon methods!
>
> Richard
>
Catalog doesn't take the Vocabulary object itself as
Casey Duncan wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > We're using the internals of ZCatalog to do searching stuff in our Python
> > Product. I've managed to get it working at a basic level by constructing a
> > Catalog instance and adding indexes and calling searchResults(). Only now I
> > nee
I am curious of how popular SQL Server is among Zope developers. We have
recenly upgraded from SQL 7 to 2000 and noticed most of the database support
for Zope centers around Oracle, MySQL, Postgres, Sybase, etc...
How many people are using this ZmxODBC database adapter? And what kind of
proble
Hello all,
Zope 2.3.1 beta 2 has been released - you can download it from
Zope.org:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.3.1b2/
Zope 2.3.1b2 contains a number of bug fixes, including the fixes
for the issues addressed by the 02/23 and 03/08 hotfixes. It also
contains a number of
Ola Juan
I think that, while on one side is very comfortable to recycle others code, there
should have been a very good reason for DC to develop that class. I had the impression
that the class is heavily used in the internals of Zope, and probably the integration
of an external module would me
Duncan Booth wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2001, you wrote in local.zope.dev:
>
>>
>> Matt wrote:
>>
>>> should have a corresponding right? In which case
>>> >> it should not have a trailing slash. They are only needed for single
>>> tags that have no corresponding close, eg etc.
>>
>> I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 08:32:14AM -0700, Casey Duncan wrote:
> Cyril Elkaim wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >The last builds of Mozilla do not accept anymore this kind of HTML tags:
> >
> >I have discuss with Moz developers and they say it's not in the standard.
> > So now we m
Brian Lloyd wrote:
>
> > >I have discuss with Moz developers and they say it's not
> > in the standard.
> > > So now we must use something like . All the other
> > tags must follow
> > > the same syntax, of course.
> >
> > So then Mozilla doesn't support XHTML?? That is where that whole
>
On 15 Mar 2001, you wrote in local.zope.dev:
>
>Matt wrote:
>> should have a corresponding right? In which case
>>>it should not have a trailing slash. They are only needed for single
>>tags that have no corresponding close, eg etc.
>
> I agree but in the management interface of
Hello,
IMHO the long term solution would be to use the mxDateTime [1]
module instead of the DateTime module that currently uses Zope.
best regards,
jdavid
[1] http://www.lemburg.com/files/python/mxDateTime.html
>
> Hello
>
> I am playing around with the DateTime module in order to adapt
Brian wrote:
>I think what he's saying is that Moz used to tolerate a
>form like:
>
>...
>
>...which doesn't make much sense (and appeared in the Zope
>UI by mistake). I believe that it is still ok to use the
>XHTML form for non-container tags, e.g.:
>
>The 'select' tag problem in the Zop
Hello
I am playing around with the DateTime module in order to adapt it to other formats
than the American one. However, I would like not to start a work that someone is
already doing or that is already done. I have found a little patch that solves
temporarily the problem, but I would like to
Matt wrote:
> should have a corresponding right? In which case no,
>it should not have a trailing slash. They are only needed for single tags
>that have no corresponding close, eg etc.
I agree but in the management interface of Zope it's not the case. You
have Some stuff... a
Yes, I know, but that's what they say :-). I've already that problem with
the script tag and they refuse to change this behavior, at least for now...
Cyril
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> >I have discuss with Moz developers and they say it's not
> in the standard.
> > So now we must use something like . All the other
> tags must follow
> > the same syntax, of course.
>
> So then Mozilla doesn't support XHTML?? That is where that whole
> trailing slash
> convention is c
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Casey Duncan wrote:
> Cyril Elkaim wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >The last builds of Mozilla do not accept anymore this kind of HTML tags:
> >
> >I have discuss with Moz developers and they say it's not in the standard.
> > So now we must use something li
Cyril Elkaim wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>The last builds of Mozilla do not accept anymore this kind of HTML tags:
>
>I have discuss with Moz developers and they say it's not in the standard.
> So now we must use something like . All the other tags must follow
> the same syntax, of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We're using the internals of ZCatalog to do searching stuff in our Python
> Product. I've managed to get it working at a basic level by constructing a
> Catalog instance and adding indexes and calling searchResults(). Only now I
> need to get into more advanced featur
hi ZPattern-Freaks out there,
i want to write an ImapClient for CyrusImap as Zope-Product.
- Handle several Mailboxes
- Use Zope-Management for IMAP-Folder-Management and ACL/Security
- Use Custom-Interface as Mailclient
The Final Structue I want to have. It should act like a standart Zope
Folde
I wanted to get BerkeleyStorage installed on my Windows system.
Since there is a nice downloadable binary version of the Python
bindings for version 3.2, I downloaded and installed that, then
modified BerkeleyStorage.py to support the new interface instead
of the old one.
If anyone wants a cop
I'm making some mod's to the property sheets to allow them to fire an event
(call a hook) when they change on an instance. Anyway, it looks like I'm
gonna have to hand the REQUEST object all around, so I can get the data out
of it that I need (as well as allow other inspection in the future).
An
Hi,
The last builds of Mozilla do not accept anymore this kind of HTML tags:
I have discuss with Moz developers and they say it's not in the standard.
So now we must use something like . All the other tags must follow
the same syntax, of course.
The problem with the ma
No, superuser doesn't work.
My workaround for the moment is to comment out line 302
( __roles__ = ('Manager',) )
and waiting for Martijns new release.
Thanks
Arno
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Arno Gross wrote:
> > Any hints?
>
> A *workaround* (that
32 matches
Mail list logo
