Whereas XML attributes, order indeterminisim, slots, METAL and templates
are?
Adrian...
- Original Message -
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marc Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] stacks != easy to
Don't even get me started on that one!
I don't think this is neccessarily a criticism of Zope though, or ZPT. We
are all human, and apt to err. ZPT is imperfect, but the balance of opinion
would appear to be that it is better than what has gone before. It is
irritating to learn a new syntax, it
From: Marc Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
in the implementation on certain browsers. Which points to the inability
of
supposedly real programmers to understand stacks, parsing, state
machines -
not the poor HTML coders :) - if you read diatribes by the layout guys
(like alistapart)
Adrian Hungate wrote:
Whereas XML attributes, order indeterminisim,
...Solved by making it absolutely clear what order stuff executes in. If I was training
people, I'd tell them to write it in that order too...
slots, METAL and templates
are?
This is all METAL. METAL is not as simple or
Don Hopkins wrote:
To be more accurate:
Nope ;-)
SOME templating languages were never designed to be procedural languages.
...if a language is designed to be a procedural language, then it ain't a templating
language...
cheers,
Chris
___
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is hard to read (Some of us design Zope
sites TTW...)
Un-learn that habit too. It's so nice having things like search replace
and syntax
highlighting afterall...
Now, this is an interesting statement and one I have heard often, and that I
Hi Dario,
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the TTW part is what is one of the
strenghts of Zope -
Well, no, not really. Being able to edit stuff remotely is where Zope's real strength
lies. WebDAV and FTP are much better than using sucky HTTP forms to do this
Anybody has any light to shed on this ? Especially the second
paragraph...
Thanks,
Florent
Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With an object path /A/B/C where C has a local role allowing a user to
view C but where B disallows acquisition of the View permission, the
publisher
Myroslav Opyr wrote:
System Platform
freebsd4
Are you running with the pthread stack size patches applied to Python?
See
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=554841group_id=5470atid=305470
for the patch, and recompile Python with
OPT=-g -O2 -DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x2
Hi,
it look like it works! I have to give site some time to run to be sure.
Where I can vote for a bug or to give comments? On SF.tracker issue? to
make it go into release.
As far as I understand the patch is quick-hack to make it work and do not
solve the issue completely, just increase the
add your comment, encouragement, flames et to the sourceforge bug tracker
issue. i guess that would help most.
jens
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 10:55 , Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
it look like it works! I have to give site some time to run to be sure.
Where I can vote for a bug or to
this particular issue is *not* solved in 2.1.3
jens
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 10:00 , Myroslav Opyr wrote:
As far as I remember the issue was solved in Python 2.1.3, wasn't it? Or
it was GC patch?
Ok, I'll try to patch sources...
m.
--
Myroslav Opyr
zope.net.ua * Ukrainian Zope
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] 'not:' kludgey?!
Don Hopkins wrote:
To be more accurate:
Nope ;-)
SOME templating languages were never designed to be procedural
languages.
...if a language is designed to be a procedural language, then it ain't a
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adrian Hungate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marc Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]; zope-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] stacks != easy to explain
Adrian Hungate wrote:
Whereas XML attributes, order
man, you have waaay to much tiem on your hands ;-)
Chris
Don Hopkins wrote:
snipHello?! How much stuff... sorry, I didn't even read it/snip
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**
whatever...
Don Hopkins wrote:
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adrian Hungate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marc Lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]; zope-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] stacks != easy to explain
Adrian Hungate wrote:
On May 15, 2002 11:13 am, Chris Withers wrote:
man, you have waaay to much tiem on your hands ;-)
Wow chris is typing sooo fast he cant spell teim properly...
--
Andy McKay
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy McKay wrote:
On May 15, 2002 11:13 am, Chris Withers wrote:
man, you have waaay to much tiem on your hands ;-)
Wow chris is typing sooo fast he cant spell teim properly...
Nah, I just suffer from IFS...
Chris
___
Zope-Dev
Adrian Hungate wrote:
Whereas XML attributes, order indeterminisim,
Chris Withers wrote:
...Solved by making it absolutely clear what order stuff executes in. If I
was training people, I'd tell them to write it in that order too...
Don Hopkins wrote:
You can't make the order of XML
Don Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Solved by making it absolutely clear what order stuff executes in.
If I was training
people, I'd tell them to write it in that order too...
You can't make the order of XML attribute execution clear, because
20 matches
Mail list logo
