Um, how does one escape * in STX-NG? As in - what if one is entering an
equation inline like 2 * 2 * 3 = 12? Or, does one just fall back on using
x?
--
Jeffrey P Shell
www.cuemedia.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.
I think this is a great idea. A good way to start would be to have a tab
on the Control Panel entitles "Updates", that would make some XML-RPC
calls to Zope.org, and provide update and hotfix information when
compared against your running server. Of course, how we know what is
available is a good
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 2:24 am, Simon Michael wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
> > I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
> > and to deprecate the current StructuredText in the long run.
>
> My two cents - there are some things in rST I would like to have but I
> think it
Ive discussed this long ago and started off ZPM to do that. However at the
time PyPPM wasnt done and distutils wasn't standard. My enthusiasm ran out
and there was this work conflict thing ;)
Zope.org doesn't really have a good product querying system, something like
Gideon is sorely needed.
> |
On Qua 04 Set 2002 15:31, Jeffrey Chan wrote:
| I'm sure this has been proposed a thousand times b4. Product
| management/download/installation really should be integrated into ZMI,
| kinda like what apt-get does now.
|
| All products is already sitting on a central repository (zope.org), all
| th
"R. David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it would be really sad. So if that is a ruling criterion, I'd
> vote for two versions of structured text, preferably with a
> translator between them.
Well, it would be easy enough (or maybe not, with current stx code) for
structured text to accept
I'm sure this has been proposed a thousand times b4. Product
management/download/installation really should be integrated into ZMI, kinda like what
apt-get does now.
All products is already sitting on a central repository (zope.org), all that's needed
is a front-end and a standard packaging po
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
> When writing books, however, you're most likely using an editor that makes
> it easy to reformat blocks at the proper indentation level. For a lot of
> web input where you still want to allow some simple structure, indentation
It would be really sad i
On 9/4/02 10:59 AM, "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, the indenting hassle is one of the best features of "classic"
> STX. It's a pain to line things up but it does make for very
> readable source documents. I think STX-NG is a little better than
> ReST for constructing reada
Does anyone know if the confera product will run under 2.5.1, tried
with an old installation of 2.2.1 and it refuses to be anything but
broken?
I know there are other and better bulletin boards but need to keep some
Confera sites running if possible.
Any help/advice gratefully accepted.
Phil
IMHO, the indenting hassle is one of the best features of "classic"
STX. It's a pain to line things up but it does make for very
readable source documents. I think STX-NG is a little better than
ReST for constructing readable source docs; especially if they are
long, like chapters of a book due
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
> and to deprecate the current StructuredText in the long run.
My two cents - there are some things in rST I would like to have but I
think it has gone too far with it's rules. If I had to choose one or
[courtesy cc send to David G, so if I make any blatantly errneous statements
he can come chase me with the Big Stick :)]
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 8:01 pm, Max M wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
> >I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
> >and to deprecate the current Stru
Andreas Jung wrote:
>I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
>and to deprecate the current StructuredText in the long run.
>
+1
>Open points: how to migrate exisiting STX documents to reStructuredText
>
>
Wouldn't the simplest solution be:
???
Then we
Leonardo,
Many thanks for the hints. I will investigate, but I probably won't have
time until next week.
> Of course, this all depends on how well gdb (or your preferred debugger,
> should you chose to adapt the instructions) works correctly with threads
> on True64.
In my experience, the Tru64
The exisiting implementation of StructuredText in Zope has
several disadvantages:
- its behaviour depends on the locale settings (letters and punctuation
is taken from the locale settings). In some case the locale settings
are imcomplete (characters ¡ and ¿ are not available through the
Could you do one for ZPT? :-)
Chris
de ZORZI Frederic wrote:
> http://www.zope.org/Members/fredz/html-helper-mode
>
> Here you can find a modified version of html-helper-mode.el (3.0.4jolly)
> for emacs who supports dtml tags :
>
> - Auto-indentation (with a little help :))
> - Shortcuts / Co
17 matches
Mail list logo