Tim Peters wrote at 2003-9-14 16:40 -0400:
...
[Dieter Maurer]
Whoever wants to use it right now: the no more ReadConflictErrors
patch on
http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope
does precisely this (for storages that support history information).
How has that
Hi all,
I'd like to understand how the communication between the ZServer and the ZODB
works. As far as i know the ZServer (Web server) talks to the ZPublisher (ORB)
to get the Requested Object. But do they communicate via tcpip sockets or
unix sockets?
I have a problem with hanging connections
Tim Peters wrote:
Probably none for many apps. You'll be working with possibly non-current
data, so think of ways your apps could possibly be damaged by that. For
example, you're Bill Gates, using ZODB to track all your assets. A summary
report takes hours to generate, and by the time you get
Alexander Schad wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to understand how the communication between the ZServer and the
ZODB
works. As far as i know the ZServer (Web server) talks to the ZPublisher
(ORB)
to get the Requested Object. But do they communicate via tcpip sockets
or unix sockets?
Neither, AFAIK.
I
At 13:17 15.09.2003 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Alexander Schad wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to understand how the communication between the ZServer and the
ZODB
works. As far as i know the ZServer (Web server) talks to the ZPublisher
(ORB)
to get the Requested Object. But do they communicate via
Alexander Schad wrote:
Yes an oracle DB and i'm using an external session service to store and
retrieve
session data using the httplib.
I think using httplib to return session data is risk to put it mildly. I'd put
money on the fact that it's either that or your ORacle query that's hanging...
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:49:50PM +0200, Alexander Schad wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to understand how the communication between the ZServer and the
ZODB
works. As far as i know the ZServer (Web server) talks to the ZPublisher
(ORB)
to get the Requested Object. But do they communicate via
Tres Seaver wrote:
The empty E-tag exists to support *very* broken clients (MSOffice over
WebFolders); it should be removed, perhaps with a knob which allows
re-enabling it for the sites that actually have people editing content
using those clients.
Yeah it should be removed, but I'd say
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 22:59, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
Dieter wrote:
Please read the HTTP 1.1 spec...
Caching requires either an ETag or Last-Modified header.
For good reasons...
That would explain why it never got fixed, but that's not how I
understand the RFC:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:14:51PM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Fred Yankowski wrote:
But I can't see how to create more restrictive Predicate. My initial
attempt was to set Predicate like so:
python: content.meta_type == 'Filesystem Image'
Do you have any content with this metatype?
10 matches
Mail list logo