Tim Peters wrote at 2003-9-14 16:40 -0400: > ... > [Dieter Maurer] > > Whoever wants to use it right now: the "no more ReadConflictErrors" > > patch on > > > > <http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope> > > > > does precisely this (for storages that support history information). > > How has that been working out for people (not limited to Dieter)?
It works fine for us. We are working on a content management system with tens of thousands of large SGML/XML documents. My colleague likes to make parallel imports. Before the patch, cataloguing (using an improved version of Shane's "QueueCatalog") did almost not proceed due to an incredible amount of "ReadConflictError"s. After the patch, there are occasional "WriteConflictError"s (caused by the catalog BTrees performing conflict resolution only at the leaf level), but in general the system is stable. We now use it also in production systems without problems. > That's > indeed what we're after, although Jeremy has in mind deeper/broader changes > aimed at being more efficient than digging thru history. The history is consulted only rarely (only when the current state is too young). However, in this case, the pickled data is read twice. Of course, I do not mind when it gets more efficient... Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
