There are some discussions in the grok and bluebream lists about the
opportunity
to upgrade to buildout 1.5, as it will provide *isolation without virtualenv*,
so it should facilitate installations and deployments.
Is it too late for the ZTK 1.0?
Is it worth at least trying to see what it
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
There are some discussions in the grok and bluebream lists about the
opportunity
to upgrade to buildout 1.5, as it will provide *isolation without virtualenv*,
so it should facilitate installations and deployments.
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Sep 16 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Fri Sep 17 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 49 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 21 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 8 from ccomb at free.fr, 10 from jdriessen at
thehealthagency.com.
Test
HS Right now I just want to get a stable ZTK 1.0 out and not add any new
HS features to it. We have the trunk open for development.
+1
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZERmailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
Rainy days and Mondays always get me down.
Hi,
i have a little question.
Is there a chance to not drop Python2.4 Support for ZTK1.1?
I ask because Redhat Enterprise Linux 5 is shipped with Python2.4,
and should have been supported for some years from now.
Regards,
Andre
pgpJ3FjGG17rV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, September 17, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Right now I just want to get a stable ZTK 1.0 out and not add any new
features to it. We have the trunk open for development.
+1 zc.buildout 1.5 caused great pain here at work! I have worked with Gary to
rectify the problems, but I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andre Schubert wrote:
i have a little question.
Is there a chance to not drop Python2.4 Support for ZTK1.1?
I ask because Redhat Enterprise Linux 5 is shipped with Python2.4,
and should have been supported for some years from now.
At this point,
2010/9/17 Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr:
Le 14/09/2010 11:49, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
After the release of the ZTK 1.0c1 I also created a maintenance branch
for the ZTK 1.0. The branch can be found at:
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zopetoolkit/branches/1.0
just done for
On Friday, September 17, 2010, Tres Seaver wrote:
i have a little question.
Is there a chance to not drop Python2.4 Support for ZTK1.1?
I ask because Redhat Enterprise Linux 5 is shipped with Python2.4,
and should have been supported for some years from now.
At this point, the burden of
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Friday, September 17, 2010, Tres Seaver wrote:
i have a little question.
Is there a chance to not drop Python2.4 Support for ZTK1.1?
I ask because Redhat Enterprise Linux 5 is shipped with Python2.4,
Le 17/09/2010 16:50, Gediminas Paulauskas a écrit :
2010/9/17 Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr:
Le 14/09/2010 11:49, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hi.
After the release of the ZTK 1.0c1 I also created a maintenance branch
for the ZTK 1.0. The branch can be found at:
The test suite is not registered in setup.py of zope.datetime
Robin
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin Lee wrote:
The test suite is not registered in setup.py of zope.i18n.
Please enter a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.i18n
Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver +1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin Lee wrote:
The test suite is not registered in setup.py of zope.datetime
Please enter a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.datetime
Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver +1
I suspect that the shenanigans played by the ZODB persistent cache
implementation is running afoul of some changes in the garbage
collection implementation in Python 2.7.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/641481
The person reporting this was running a Python compiled in debug mode.
This
15 matches
Mail list logo
