This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-06-12 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-06-13 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
>> interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
>> interface, here's what happens:
>>
> from zop
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
> interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
> interface, here's what happens:
>
from zope.component.registry import Components
c = Components()
Am 13.06.2011, 17:01 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers :
> I have something, I want something that implements IWhatever.
> Now, it may well be that something implements IWhatever, but it may
> also not. As the author of the code in question, I don't want to have to
> care.
> Other authors can plug
On 13/06/2011 15:26, Charlie Clark wrote:
>> In order to get the object itself back from such an adaptation, you need
>> to use the default= argument.
>
> I know that the question has been answered but your question makes me ask
> another: why would you want to adapt an object with itself?
I have
Stepping in… and +1 for the original question
On 06/13/2011 04:26 PM, Charlie Clark wrote:
> I know that the question has been answered but your question makes me ask
> another: why would you want to adapt an object with itself?
The sake of logical consistency should be enough. If you think of
Hiya,
Am 12.06.2011, 22:48 Uhr, schrieb Chris McDonough :
from zope.component.registry import Components
c = Components()
from zope.interface import Interface, implements
class IFoo(Interface): pass
> ...
class Foo(object):
> ... implements(IFoo)
> ...
foo = Foo(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 01:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> [5]FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
>https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-June/043168.html
This fails (wihtout much other information) trying to download
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:08 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 21:48, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
> > interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
> > interface, here's what happens:
> >
> from zope.com
On 12/06/2011 21:48, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
> interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
> interface, here's what happens:
>
from zope.component.registry import Components
c = Components()
from zo
* 2011-06-12 22:49, Chris McDonough wrote:
> This seems slightly inconsistent with the adaptation worldview imposed by
> getAdapter/queryAdapter. I think it would be more consistent if
> "c.queryAdapter(IFoo, foo)" returned foo if foo already implemented IFoo
> and there was no other more specific
11 matches
Mail list logo
