Re: [Zope-dev] Speed up the learning curve
It varies depending upon the version, I seem to remember old versions didnt do that. Mind you if you are writing Python products you are pretty far up the learning curve :) -- Andy McKay - Original Message - From: "Dieter Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rene Pijlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 2:16 PM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Speed up the learning curve > Rene Pijlman writes: > > A suggestion to cut the Zope learning curve down by half a day... > > > > When the programmer forgets the docstring in a method of a Python-based > > product, instead of saying > > > > "Sorry, the requested resource does not exist." > > > > Zope could say: > > > > "Sorry, this method has no docstring." > Doesn't it do precisely this when you run Zope in debug mode? > > > Dieter > > ___ > Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) > ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Speed up the learning curve
Rene Pijlman writes: > A suggestion to cut the Zope learning curve down by half a day... > > When the programmer forgets the docstring in a method of a Python-based > product, instead of saying > > "Sorry, the requested resource does not exist." > > Zope could say: > > "Sorry, this method has no docstring." Doesn't it do precisely this when you run Zope in debug mode? Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] ZPatterns 0.4.3 final for Zope 2.3.x released
FYI, I have uploaded a release version of ZPatterns 0.4.3 to: http://www.zope.org/Members/pje/ZPatterns I have also updated the standalone PlugIns package at: http://www.zope.org/Members/pje/PlugIns These are primarily maintenance releases for GUI and security compatibility with Zope 2.3.x. The main added features are a 'DEPENDENT ON' clause for SkinScript 'WITH...COMPUTE' declarations, and support for the enhanced Zope 2.3 BTrees. Note that Zope 2.3.3 or better is required for either release. You do not need to download the seperate PlugIns release unless you are using PlugIns without ZPatterns, as the ZPatterns package already includes a copy of the PlugIns library. Please report any problems or concerns to the ZPatterns list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (go to http://www.eby-sarna.com/mailman/listinfo/ZPatterns to subscribe). Thanks! ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Wildcards in TextIndex query. Do they work?
Abel, many thanks for this analysis, I've put this into the Collector... On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:59:32 +0200 abel deuring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik, > > I'm afraid that your patch does not solve all the > problems you mentioned > in an earlier mail. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] [BUG+PATCH] for OFS/CopySupport.py Zope-2.3.3
Hi, not sure if this is the right place to post patches, but since I've already put this one into the Collector months (year ?) ago without it being applied... the method manage_renameObjects in lib/python/OFS/CopySupport.py doesn't accept to rename an objet to the same id, it's fine. however, say you want to rename the objects A and B to respectively B and A using this method, it raises an error because B already exists. a solution to this is to make the rename in two parts, and here's the patch, which seems to work fine for the not too many tests I've done: --- CUT--- --- CopySupport.py Mon Apr 16 18:26:20 2001 +++ CopySupport.py.new Sun Jun 24 20:58:48 2001 @@ -281,9 +281,20 @@ """Rename several sub-objects""" if len(ids) != len(new_ids): raise 'Bad Request','Please rename each listed object.' +conflicts = [] for i in range(len(ids)): if ids[i] != new_ids[i]: +if new_ids[i] not in ids : # may a conflict occur ? self.manage_renameObject(ids[i], new_ids[i], REQUEST) +else : +tempo = ".temporary_%i_" % i +self.manage_renameObject(ids[i], tempo) +conflicts.append((tempo, new_ids[i])) + +# now we rename conflictuous objects +for (old, new) in conflicts : +self.manage_renameObject(old, new) + if REQUEST is not None: return self.manage_main(self, REQUEST, update_menu=1) return None --- CUT --- NB: a better temporary id should be created. hoping this helps. bye, Jerome Alet ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZPL and GPL licensing issues
On 22 Jun 2001, Simon Michael wrote: > Now here, I have to assume RMS is using "combine" above to mean > "combine and redistribute". > > I hope I'm right ? If "combine" included "install zwiki on your zope > installation and use it" then everything I know is wrong.. I did > intend for that to be fairly danger-free. I'm not sure, I've fired off another email to get a clarification. While we're one the topic, I just read an article [1] over at Kuro5hin that could enlighten the management over at Digicool and us as well; it discusses the impacts of Free Software and relates it to Free Trade, talks about barriers and other interesting things. >From the practical point of view, being able to use GPL-ed software with Zope is a Good Thing (TM) for most developers. Another thing is that some people / companies may be reluctant to add signifcant modules that could be included in the Zope core, as they will not get the same level of recognition for their work as Digital Creations would. For me personally, a Zope license without the advertising clause would motivate me, as the 'protection barrier' / 'restriction' / 'attribution issue' wouldn't be there; I have a ton of things I'd like to change in Zope and add to Zope, and as time goes by, the who-gets-credit-issue will undoubtedly be raised again, if we're so lucky that Digicool decides to open up Zope for read/write CVS access. [1] http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/6/23/3451/16661 -Morten ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Speed up the learning curve
A suggestion to cut the Zope learning curve down by half a day... When the programmer forgets the docstring in a method of a Python-based product, instead of saying "Sorry, the requested resource does not exist." Zope could say: "Sorry, this method has no docstring." Yes, I know this behaviour is well-documented. But the message gives no clue to lead the unwary newbie from the error to the documentation. There are so many useful things I could have done in this half day :-/ Regards, René Pijlman ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: command-line zope.org product upload ?
Hi, Simon Michael wrote: > Morten W. Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Cool. And maybe some apt-get functionality? Like 'zope-apt-get >> dist-upgrade'? :-) > uh, Jerome ? Hey, uh, me and the folks on the list think there's this > one little extra that would make zshell perfect.. :) Sorry for being late, I hadn't yet subscribed to this list. I'd love to do this, however it seems to be very difficult until a standard Zope package file format exists. See my posts on this subject on [EMAIL PROTECTED] However I think a "shell" command could help, e.g. in ZShell dialog box you'd type something like: shell apt-get update shell apt-get upgrade This would do it, but you'll need to have an apt-get wrapper which would have to be setuid root, so this would be very dangerous. the best solution is of course to standardize on one file format, and tweak Distutils to do what we want, then adding "zope-apt-get" to ZShell (or why not directly to Zope) will be trivial. bye, Jerome Alet ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
