Dieter Maurer wrote:
The ZODB allows to include the class (a reference to it)
into persistent references in order to avoid loading the object
state when a ghost object needs
to be created for the persistent reference.
For this to work, the class must not require arguments to "__new__".
The ZODB
Mark Hammond wrote:
Chris quoting Jim:
...
whether SVN or not, I'm guessing any use of HTTP basic authentication
mechanism qualifies as "extremely lame"! I've no idea if this is what Jim
meant though :)
OK, for those not familiar with svn/HTTP authentication, as I understand it
you have to
The ZODB allows to include the class (a reference to it)
into persistent references in order to avoid loading the object
state when a ghost object needs
to be created for the persistent reference.
For this to work, the class must not require arguments to "__new__".
The ZODB checks whether the clas
Mark Hammond schrieb:
Chris quoting Jim:
...
I would support HTTP anonymous checkouts. I'm really against
writable HTTP checkouts because I consider the credentials
mechanism for HTTP access to be extremely lame.
whether SVN or not, I'm guessing any use of HTTP basic authentication
mech
Chris quoting Jim:
> > lame program for uploading keys, I find the ssh-based access
> > mechanism to be far more usable and secure.
>
> Secure, maybe, but is it really worth it?
>
> Usable? Don't agree, especially if you're trying to develop on Windows...
As a data-point, for the last year or 2,
Jim Fulton wrote:
At one point, enabling the 'http:' checkout gateway was a sure-fire
recipe for getting SVN's knickers in a twist, which is why we disabled
it. Or maybe that was ViewCSV.
Actually, it was BekeleyDB. :)
And Jens has fixed that now, iirc?
The main obstical was that it requir
Jim Fulton wrote:
Not in principle. In fact, I would find it convenient for a particular
project. I doubt that anyone with access to that machine has time, \
although I can only speak for myself.
If I could get access, I'd make time ;-)
I think I used to have it, and I may well still do, but