On 10/2/06, Olavo Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many deprecation sign for any user are clearly signs that Zope
developers are unable to maintain certain Zope features.
No they are not. AFAIK there are only two features that have fallen
out of maintainability, and that's ZClasses and the
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7978
Blamelist:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin2.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7978
Blamelist:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7980
Blamelist: andreasjung
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin2.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7984
Blamelist: andreasjung
BUILD FAILED: failed compile
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7984
Blamelist: andreasjung
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
I do like the idea of ZClasses as a separate product.
Actually I think all of Zope should be an assembly of separate products.
I would love to see multiple flavors of Zope each as an assembly of
separate products.
If we make ZClasses a separate product, does that mean we can get our
own
