I do like the idea of ZClasses as a separate product.
Actually I think all of Zope should be an assembly of separate products.
I would love to see multiple flavors of Zope each as an assembly of
If we make ZClasses a separate product, does that mean we can get our
own mailing list for ZClasses. Maybe a separate web site, wiki, etc?
Maybe the 4 or 5 companies who care about ZClasses can get together and
fund the upgrade.
I am still not sure if the next version of my application will be in
Zope 3 or not, but if it is,
I see it as a completely separate code base.
Accordingly, this rapid evolution of Zope, to make it compatible with
Zope 3 drives a lot of us
nuts. We would prefer to just see a stable Zope 2, and an incompatible
But I get no say in the matter. Open source is good, democratic source
would be better.
I am not trying to upset people with this email message. I just want to
present a different point of view.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -