Martin Aspeli wrote at 2008-7-4 00:56 +0100:
>
>Benji York wrote:
>
>Parallisation can offer huge (!) speed increases, but it can also be
>hard to debug tests. I'd be tempted to let single threaded by the
>default, safe choice, and let people opt into parallisation only when
>they know
Benji York wrote at 2008-7-3 17:44 -0400:
>On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 17:22 -0400, Benji York wrote:
>>> I'd like to 1) remove the layer tear-down mechanism entirely, and 2)
>>> make (almost) all layers run in a subprocess.
Mark Hammond wrote:
I think you've misunderstood slightly here ... PAS was and is a Zope 2
user folder implementation. It pre-dates Zope 3 (at least as we know it
now).
I was referring to the thread at
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-pas/2004-September/86.html, entitled
"[Zope-PAS] Chal
> I think you've misunderstood slightly here ... PAS was and is a Zope 2
> user folder implementation. It pre-dates Zope 3 (at least as we know it
> now).
I was referring to the thread at
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-pas/2004-September/86.html, entitled
"[Zope-PAS] Challengers (and Zope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Hammond wrote:
>> Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU
I doubt that seriously: I would venture that there are two orders of
magnitude more users of PAS than PAU in production deployments. PAU was
an attempt to port the PAS to a "component-c
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
"may or may become a part of Zope and/or Plone in the future". Well
put Martin. ;)
Hah, obviously I meant "may or may not". :)
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
"may or may become a part of Zope and/or Plone in the future". Well
put Martin. ;)
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I call BS here. PAS is not a "custom solution", it's much more of a
standard than PAU is.
The question remains, "why?". You're reinventing wheels for Zope 2
that do not need to be reinvented. One day when PAU has indeed
surpassed PAS in terms of functionality and plu
Mark Hammond wrote:
Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU and I think Plone should too,
because:
It seems like just yesterday that PAS offered the promise of being the nice
clean way forward for authentication, and even offered a path to Zope3.
I've been subscribed to zope-dev since then, bu
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Jul 11 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Jul 12 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Jul 11 20:59:49 EDT 2008
URL: http://m
Hey,
I think it's good to attach a traceback. Did someone create a
launchpad issue out of this one yet?
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
El sáb, 05-07-2008 a las 14:26 -0700, Stephan Richter escribió:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > I'm curious about the plans of Zope 3 on Python 2.5.
> >
> > * Are people using Zope 3 with Python 2.5 already? What are your
> > experiences?
>
> Yes, works flawlessly. The probl
On Jul 12, 2008, at 03:04 , Florian Friesdorf wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:56:19PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
The one thing I am missing is: why?
Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU
Huh? Zope 2 uses PAS. The Zope 3 folks have attempted to come up with
a similar solution, bu
On Jul 12, 2008, at 09:33 , Mark Hammond wrote:
Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU and I think Plone should
too,
because:
It seems like just yesterday that PAS offered the promise of being
the nice
clean way forward for authentication, and even offered a path to
Zope3.
I've been s
Hey,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Stephan Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 04 July 2008, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Apparently, it's all good to go, even RestrictedPython.
>> The thing stopping me is that no-one seems willing and able (in that
>> combination, I'm willing but don't
--On 11. Juli 2008 18:04:16 -0700 Florian Friesdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:56:19PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> within the scope of google summer of code I am integrating zope 3's
> PAU with Plone's PAS and fur
> Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU and I think Plone should too,
> because:
It seems like just yesterday that PAS offered the promise of being the nice
clean way forward for authentication, and even offered a path to Zope3.
I've been subscribed to zope-dev since then, but somehow the anoin
17 matches
Mail list logo
