Hi,
On 05.07.2009, at 07:06, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> 2009/7/5 Stephan Richter :
>> To be honest, I am very disappointed by this list. It is totally
>> meaningless
>> to me since it does not represent any list with which I can build
>> even a
>> fairly simple application today. There is not a
On 03.07.2009, at 12:33, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone
>> upates (via buildout etc a) module they need to remember to
>> remove the recreated file before redeploying th
On 03.07.2009, at 10:38, Chris Withers wrote:
> Tim Hoffman wrote:
>> gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/
>> _zope_i18nmessageid_message.py",
>> line 6, in __bootstrap__
>>imp.load_dynamic(__name__,__file__)
>> File "/base/python_dist/lib/python2.5/py_imp.py", line 116, in
>> load
Hi,
yes, I'd really appreciate such a modification. Then I could delete
the regarding code in my rod.recipe.appengine, which provides a dummy
implementation of imp.load_dynamic.
Tim, do you have a list of the concerning packages? I could help
making these changes. A good reason to file an a
On 19.04.2009, at 10:52, Andreas Jung wrote:
> I just released Zope 2.12.0a2:
>
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Zope2/2.12.0a2
doc/CHANGES.rst is missing in the source distribution on pypi:
Getting distribution for 'Zope2'.
error: doc/CHANGES.rst: No such file or directory
An error occured when tr
Hi,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> I'ld rather not see a whole slew of extra packagse appear. I also
wonder
>>> how the extra number of packages and increasing size of sys.path
>>> influence performance and restrictions on environments like G
On 28.03.2009, at 00:36, Chris Withers wrote:
> There are currently two seperate issue with specifying zope2 as an
> egg in a buildout.cfg.
>
> Which of these two issues is your solution designed to address?
My versions.cfg resolved all version conflicts mentioned within this
thread.
On 28.03.2009, at 00:30, Chris Withers wrote:
> Tobias Rodäbel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> had the same issue tonight. I'm using attached versions.cfg for now.
>> That works quite well for me.
>
> Which issue is this supposed to help with?
Using zc.buildout. Thi
Hi,
had the same issue tonight. I'm using attached versions.cfg for now.
That works quite well for me.
Cheers,
Tobias
[buildout]
versions = versions
[versions]
Acquisition = 2.12.0a1
DateTime = 2.11.2
ExtensionClass = 2.11.1
Persistence = 2.11.1
tempstorage = 2.11.1
zLOG = 2.11.1
ClientForm =
