Simon Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or, if someone wants to distribute something which includes zope and
> one or more GPL products.
I mean, eg, you want to distribute your end-user package Easy Portal
Creator 2000, based on zope/ptk/squishdot/zwiki.
_
>
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:48:20 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juan
> David Ibáñez Palomar) wrote:
>
> > it's illegal to distribute GPL code together
> >with [ZPL] code
>
> I dont see this as an issue for Zope (taken as a whole). There is no
> problem with other developers releasing GPL produ
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jimmie Houchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GPL would protect DC from predatory competitors. It would also allow
> > for Zope's adoption in certain environments. I also believe some people
>
> And prevent it in others.
>
> > would relicense their pro
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:48:20 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juan
David Ibáñez Palomar) wrote:
> it's illegal to distribute GPL code together
>with [ZPL] code
I dont see this as an issue for Zope (taken as a whole). There is no
problem with other developers releasing GPL products for Zope, as lo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jimmie Houchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The GPL would protect DC from predatory competitors. It would also allow
> for Zope's adoption in certain environments. I also believe some people
And prevent it in others.
> would relicense their products to the GPL if
I personally do not have a problem with the Zope license. However, I do
use a lot of GPLed software and appreciate it. I also am appreciative of
the ability to use Zope and to take advantage of the wonderful work that
DC has produced. When the original debate occurred I was in support of
DC mainta
Some quick points on this.
First, feel free to talk on this list about ways that Zope
developers can license their stuff. It's a constructive
discussion, and since I'm not a Zope developer, I can ignore
it. :^)
Second, regarding the licensing of Zope itself, ChrisP is
right that I'm the guy on
Juan, thanks for shining some light towards this murky area. Maybe
ZWiki and other zope products need to be LGPL or dual-licensed, maybe
the zope license can use some refinement. I for one won't know without
seeing some enlightened discussion of the issue.
This stuff is unsexy but important.
Bes
>
>
>
> Regaurding licensing, twhile I wouldn't want to snuff out freedom of speech,
> I would say that we have already had the "Licensing Wars" about 18 months
> ago, and things are settled and non negotiable at this point. Arguing only
> creates tension in the community, which does more dama
> this is not about religion and a flame war is the last thing I want
>
> I only wanted to let you know about these facts, and yes there're
> projects that have been hurt by "license issues", for example KDE.
Regaurding licensing, twhile I wouldn't want to snuff out freedom of speech,
I would sa
>
> Has any open source license issue actually come to court yet?
>
> How many people really care about this compared to the number of people
> who just want to get on, develop and use software in an open source
> community fashion and don't want to get involved in religious flame
> wars?
>
> M
Juan David IbXXez Palomar wrote:
>
> And more, there's already zope software with the GPL license, for
> example ZWiki. ZWiki is included in Debian, probably the Debian
> developer that maintains the package is not aware of these license
> issues.
Has any open source license issue actually come
>
> Juan David IbXXez Palomar wrote:
> >
> > software, but I know there's people that don't use Zope because of this
> > incompatibility.
>
> their loss...
>
> Chris
>
yes, their loss, but also our loss
www.barrapunto.com is the most important weblog about free software
in Spain and probab
Juan David IbXXez Palomar wrote:
>
> software, but I know there's people that don't use Zope because of this
> incompatibility.
their loss...
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cro
>
> The FSF page says this in regards to the ZPL:
>
> [snip]
> > We urge you not to use the license of Zope for software you write.
> However,
> > there is no reason to avoid running programs that have been released under
> > this license, such as Zope.
>
> So what is the issue you are raising?
The FSF page says this in regards to the ZPL:
[snip]
> We urge you not to use the license of Zope for software you write.
However,
> there is no reason to avoid running programs that have been released under
> this license, such as Zope.
So what is the issue you are raising? Any software you wri
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Juan David Ibáñez Palomar wrote:
>
> has come to my ears that there's people who doesn't use Zope because
> its license is GPL-incompatible, more info here:
>
> http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
They say it's an in
Hi all,
(specially to DC)
has come to my ears that there's people who doesn't use Zope because
its license is GPL-incompatible, more info here:
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
only wanted to let you know,
if more details are required just reply to th
18 matches
Mail list logo
