Brett Carter wrote:
I have a folder with greater than 5000 ZClass instances in it. It
takes 5mins to do an objectValues for every object in the folder -
is there a higher perfomance call I could make?
-Brett
Standard folder performance degrades pretty quickly once you get
a lot of objects
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] objectValues performance
Brett Carter wrote:
I have a folder with greater than 5000 ZClass instances in it. It
takes 5mins to do an objectValues for every object in the folder -
is there a higher perfomance call
Ok, I'll bite. Why doesn't the standard folder scale? Seems like a
design flaw to me - why doesn't the default folder use catalogs or BTrees?
-Brett
"Casey" == Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Casey Brett Carter wrote:
I have a folder with greater than 5000 ZClass instances
Brett Carter wrote:
Ok, I'll bite. Why doesn't the standard folder scale? Seems like a
design flaw to me - why doesn't the default folder use catalogs or BTrees?
-Brett
Because massive scale is not a requirment of folders, they are meant to
organize content for humans, not to be
Brett Carter wrote:
Ok, I'll bite. Why doesn't the standard folder scale? Seems like a
design flaw to me - why doesn't the default folder use catalogs or BTrees?
-Brett
AFAIK a standard folder uses a linear search when you request an object from it
(ala Python dictionaries, someone please
"Michel" == Michel Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michel Because massive scale is not a requirment of folders, they
Michel are meant to organize content for humans, not to be
Michel large-collection containers. A folder with 5000 elements
Michel is not very useful to a
Brett Carter wrote:
I have a folder with greater than 5000 ZClass instances in it. It
takes 5mins to do an objectValues for every object in the folder -
is there a higher perfomance call I could make?
-Brett
use a catalog. (which only help if you want a filtered set or a schema
attrs of
