Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-19 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello Christophe,

Sunday, April 18, 2010, 2:54:08 AM, you wrote:

CC Adam GROSZER a écrit :
 Hello,
 
 There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=html
 
 Anyone for/against those versions?
 
 The open questions that remain:
 * What about pytz 2010g?
 * Which lxml version to take? 1.3.6?
 * What about zope.app.container 3.6.2?
 * Would be nice to have zope.testbrowser 3.5.1
 
 Comments are welcome.
 


CC For the KGS 3.4.1, I think we should upgrade zc.buildout to at least 1.3.1.
CC while releasing z3c.layer, I've run into a bug of zc.buildout 1.1 that 
prevented
CC from adding extras dependencies for tests.


Versions updated.

-- 
Best regards,
 Adam GROSZERmailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
God hides things by putting them all around us. 
- Anonymous 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-19 Thread Jonathan Ballet
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=html

 Anyone for/against those versions?

Tres Seaver just released zope.securitypolicy 3.4.4 (3.4.3 was buggy).
There was a subtle bug, which was triggered if you used
zope.securitypolicy's security policy without having zope.dublincore
package already loaded.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564525 for more informations.

Could I suggest you to include this version (3.4.4) in Zope KGS 3.4.1 ?

Thanks,

 Jonathan
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-19 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello Jonathan,

done

Monday, April 19, 2010, 6:56:34 PM, you wrote:

JB On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=html

 Anyone for/against those versions?

JB Tres Seaver just released zope.securitypolicy 3.4.4 (3.4.3 was buggy).
JB There was a subtle bug, which was triggered if you used
JB zope.securitypolicy's security policy without having zope.dublincore
JB package already loaded.
JB See https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564525 for more informations.

JB Could I suggest you to include this version (3.4.4) in Zope KGS 3.4.1 ?

JB Thanks,

JB  Jonathan


-- 
Best regards,
 Adam GROSZERmailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
'Tis mad idolatry to make the service greater than the god. 
- William Shakespeare 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-17 Thread Christophe Combelles
Christophe Combelles a écrit :
 Roger a écrit :
 Hi 

 Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

 Adam GROSZER a écrit :
 Hello,

 There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1 

 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=
 html

 Anyone for/against those versions?

 The open questions that remain:
 * What about pytz 2010g?
 * Which lxml version to take? 1.3.6?
 * What about zope.app.container 3.6.2?
 * Would be nice to have zope.testbrowser 3.5.1

 Comments are welcome.

 z3c.layer has a major security issue, because of trusted 
 traversing adapters that removes the security proxy 
 everywhere. 
 yes and no, only miss use could end in security issues
 It's not really a security issue, it's the only concept which allows
 to use nested sites with more then one IAuthentication utility
 and allows to authenticate on objects behind the first site.

 But since this was such a rare use case, we decided to split
 the package in different packages which also supports a non
 trusted setup. This makes the packages more general usable
 without to run into security issues based on trusted
 confirgurations where non trusted is needed.

 This package has been retired and splitted into 
 its 3 subpackages :

 z3c.layer.minimal
 z3c.layer.pagelet
 Both package above should not use trusted traverser

 z3c.layer.trusted
 This package should still use trusted traverser

 There is no problem upgrading to branch 1.0 of these 
 packages, as they don't have any significant changes, 
 excepted the splitting. However:

 z3c.layer.pagelet should be in version 1.0.2. Nothing below.
 z3c.layer.minimal has no corrected 1.0 branch. A new 
 maintenance release 1.0.2 of this package should be released.
 z3c.layer.trusted is OK, since this is trusted in purpose. (I think)
 Yes
 
 
 Ok thanks, I'll release z3c.layer.minimal during the WE.


I've released z3c.layer.minimal 1.0.2 with the fix,
and z3c.layer 0.2.4 with the same fix.

For the KGS 3.4.1, we just have to upgrade z3c.layer to 0.2.4.
No need to add z3c.layer.[pagelet|minimal|trusted]

Christophe



 
 
 
 Regards
 Roger Ineichen

 Christophe
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  ** (Related lists -  
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



 
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists - 
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-16 Thread Roger
Hi 

 Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions
 
 Adam GROSZER a écrit :
  Hello,
  
  There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1 
  
 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=
  html
  
  Anyone for/against those versions?
  
  The open questions that remain:
  * What about pytz 2010g?
  * Which lxml version to take? 1.3.6?
  * What about zope.app.container 3.6.2?
  * Would be nice to have zope.testbrowser 3.5.1
  
  Comments are welcome.
  
 
 z3c.layer has a major security issue, because of trusted 
 traversing adapters that removes the security proxy 
 everywhere. 

yes and no, only miss use could end in security issues
It's not really a security issue, it's the only concept which allows
to use nested sites with more then one IAuthentication utility
and allows to authenticate on objects behind the first site.

But since this was such a rare use case, we decided to split
the package in different packages which also supports a non
trusted setup. This makes the packages more general usable
without to run into security issues based on trusted
confirgurations where non trusted is needed.

 This package has been retired and splitted into 
 its 3 subpackages :
 
 z3c.layer.minimal
 z3c.layer.pagelet

Both package above should not use trusted traverser

 z3c.layer.trusted

This package should still use trusted traverser

 
 There is no problem upgrading to branch 1.0 of these 
 packages, as they don't have any significant changes, 
 excepted the splitting. However:
 
 z3c.layer.pagelet should be in version 1.0.2. Nothing below.
 z3c.layer.minimal has no corrected 1.0 branch. A new 
 maintenance release 1.0.2 of this package should be released.
 z3c.layer.trusted is OK, since this is trusted in purpose. (I think)

Yes

Regards
Roger Ineichen

 Christophe
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  ** (Related lists -  
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-16 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:29, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
 The open questions that remain:
 * What about pytz 2010g?

I'm not sure it makes sense fixing it to a particular version at all,
as you might want timezone updates separately. Just sayin'. :)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-16 Thread Adam Groszer
Hello,

I think it's about having a known set of versions for the tests.
Not that test run picks up some newer versions and the tests suddenly fail.

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:29, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
 The open questions that remain:
 * What about pytz 2010g?

 I'm not sure it makes sense fixing it to a particular version at all,
 as you might want timezone updates separately. Just sayin'. :)

 --
 Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
 http://regebro.wordpress.com/
 +33 661 58 14 64




-- 
Best regards,
Adam
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-16 Thread Christophe Combelles
Roger a écrit :
 Hi 
 
 Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

 Adam GROSZER a écrit :
 Hello,

 There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1 

 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=
 html

 Anyone for/against those versions?

 The open questions that remain:
 * What about pytz 2010g?
 * Which lxml version to take? 1.3.6?
 * What about zope.app.container 3.6.2?
 * Would be nice to have zope.testbrowser 3.5.1

 Comments are welcome.

 z3c.layer has a major security issue, because of trusted 
 traversing adapters that removes the security proxy 
 everywhere. 
 
 yes and no, only miss use could end in security issues
 It's not really a security issue, it's the only concept which allows
 to use nested sites with more then one IAuthentication utility
 and allows to authenticate on objects behind the first site.
 
 But since this was such a rare use case, we decided to split
 the package in different packages which also supports a non
 trusted setup. This makes the packages more general usable
 without to run into security issues based on trusted
 confirgurations where non trusted is needed.
 
 This package has been retired and splitted into 
 its 3 subpackages :

 z3c.layer.minimal
 z3c.layer.pagelet
 
 Both package above should not use trusted traverser
 
 z3c.layer.trusted
 
 This package should still use trusted traverser
 
 There is no problem upgrading to branch 1.0 of these 
 packages, as they don't have any significant changes, 
 excepted the splitting. However:

 z3c.layer.pagelet should be in version 1.0.2. Nothing below.
 z3c.layer.minimal has no corrected 1.0 branch. A new 
 maintenance release 1.0.2 of this package should be released.
 z3c.layer.trusted is OK, since this is trusted in purpose. (I think)
 
 Yes


Ok thanks, I'll release z3c.layer.minimal during the WE.



 
 Regards
 Roger Ineichen
 
 Christophe
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  ** (Related lists -  
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

 
 
 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] KGS 3.4.1 versions

2010-04-15 Thread Christophe Combelles
Adam GROSZER a écrit :
 Hello,
 
 There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
 http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQoutput=html
 
 Anyone for/against those versions?
 
 The open questions that remain:
 * What about pytz 2010g?
 * Which lxml version to take? 1.3.6?
 * What about zope.app.container 3.6.2?
 * Would be nice to have zope.testbrowser 3.5.1
 
 Comments are welcome.
 

z3c.layer has a major security issue, because of trusted traversing adapters 
that removes the security proxy everywhere. This package has been retired and 
splitted into its 3 subpackages :

z3c.layer.minimal
z3c.layer.pagelet
z3c.layer.trusted

There is no problem upgrading to branch 1.0 of these packages, as they don't 
have any significant changes, excepted the splitting. However:

z3c.layer.pagelet should be in version 1.0.2. Nothing below.
z3c.layer.minimal has no corrected 1.0 branch. A new maintenance release 1.0.2 
of this package should be released.
z3c.layer.trusted is OK, since this is trusted in purpose. (I think)

Christophe
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )