Re: [Zope-dev] Zopezen.org is slower! Should time be spent on Plone or ZPT speed?

2002-10-03 Thread Paul Everitt
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 07:14 Europe/Paris, Andy McKay wrote: I smell commecial interest here. I smell people trying to make that one killer project hoping to make it big, instead of centering around the one vehicle that will help make a bunch of projects big someday. I won't

Re: [Zope-dev] Zopezen.org is slower! Should time be spent on Plone or ZPT speed?

2002-10-03 Thread Paul Everitt
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 10:51 Europe/Paris, James Johnson wrote: Please don't get me wrong, products like squishdot, CMFZen, and others have steered me towards Zope. They are fine examples of the things that make Zope appealing. But if you really think about what I'm saying you

Re: [Zope-dev] Zopezen.org is slower! Should time be spent on Plone or ZPT speed?

2002-10-02 Thread Andy McKay
Hi James. Firstly lets address your subject. ZopeZen.org is slower. Why is that? - There is a lot more work being done to render a page in Plone - There is less caching being done, I havent optimized it as much as the old site was - The BSD memory leak in Python 2.1.3 is not helping - More

Re: [Zope-dev] Zopezen.org is slower! Should time be spent on Plone or ZPT speed?

2002-10-02 Thread Andy McKay
Thanks for you kind explanation. I may have been premature in my assessment the new Zopezen.org. Well the proof is the in the pudding, give me a bit of time and we'll see. But with some good people switching channels, will Zope still end up a major player in the market? Unfortunately