Chris Withers wrote at 2009-4-2 20:36 +0100:
> ...
>> Personally, I evaluate such eggs in a sandbox, and then add them to the
>> project-specific index once I'm sure that they work with the other
>> software in the index: I don't use PyPI at all when building out
>> production sites.
>
>That seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
Personally, I evaluate such eggs in a sandbox, and then add them to the
project-specific index once I'm sure that they work with the other
software in the index: I don't use PyPI at all when bui
Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> Personally, I evaluate such eggs in a sandbox, and then add them to the
>>> project-specific index once I'm sure that they work with the other
>>> software in the index: I don't use PyPI at all when building out
>>> production sites.
>> That seems overly heavyweight for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Chris Withers wrote:
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
could tell people to 'easy_install' from
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
>>> could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
>>>
>>> $ /path/to/bin/easy_install -i http://kgs.zope.org/Zope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
>> could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
>>
>> $ /path/to/bin/easy_install -i http
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
> could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
>
> $ /path/to/bin/easy_install -i http://kgs.zope.org/Zope2/2.1.2
But how do you then set things up when you wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> Please look at the getPackages() method taking the version*cfg files
>>> into account. So all versions should be pinned. However there is
>>> obviously a difference between using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 16.03.2009 17:21 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>
>> Maybe generating indexes from the varios "known good" metadata we are
>> already maintaining would be the right path.
>
>
> By "index" you refer to a KGS or a release-specific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.03.2009 17:21 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> Maybe generating indexes from the varios "known good" metadata we are
> already maintaining would be the right path.
By "index" you refer to a KGS or a release-specific directory containing
the bless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.03.2009 17:40 Uhr, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> Please look at the getPackages() method taking the version*cfg files
>>> into account. So all versions should be pinned. However there is
>>> obviously a
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Please look at the getPackages() method taking the version*cfg files
>> into account. So all versions should be pinned. However there is
>> obviously a difference between using buildout with pinned versions
>> and setuptools or a small undetected hole in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 16.03.2009 4:52 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
Date:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.03.2009 4:52 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
>>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:42:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:42:00 -
>> From: dmaurer
>> Reply-To: Bug 34307
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:42:00 -
> From: dmaurer
> Reply-To: Bug 343079 <343...@bugs.launchpad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message
Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:42:00 -
From: dmaurer
Reply-To: Bug 343079 <343...@bugs.launchpad.net>
To: tsea...@palladion.com
References: <20090315074
17 matches
Mail list logo
