Tres Seaver wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Brian Lloyd wrote:
...
Speaking of, the dev.zope.org/CVS/ area should probably be updated to:
1. capture the current state of affairs (2.8 / HEAD on svn and
2.7 on CVS), since it is currently mostly 'in the heads' of the
various Zope devs
Good poi
Jim Fulton wrote:
Brian Lloyd wrote:
...
Speaking of, the dev.zope.org/CVS/ area should probably be updated to:
1. capture the current state of affairs (2.8 / HEAD on svn and
2.7 on CVS), since it is currently mostly 'in the heads' of the
various Zope devs
Good point.
2. translate
Brian Lloyd wrote:
...
Speaking of, the dev.zope.org/CVS/ area should probably be
updated to:
1. capture the current state of affairs (2.8 / HEAD on svn
and 2.7 on CVS), since it is currently mostly 'in the
heads' of the various Zope devs
Good point.
2. translate the CVS FAQ to th
> > http://dev.zope.org/CVS/ContributorFAQ refers to CVS (and zope3-dev).
> > I think all references to CVS should be changed to SVN. Should I go
> > ahead and update the document?
>
> No. CVS is still used for managing the 2.7 branch of Zope, and is still
> relevant there.
>
> Tres.
Speaking
