Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-21 Thread Jim Fulton
Martijn Faassen wrote:
alan runyan wrote:
Alan, does that address your concerns?

Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so
there's nothing to adopt yet. :)  But I certainly encourage folks to
participate and help Martijn figure out what the approach should be.

Raphael, I think its great that Jim responded. Now we (collectively)
need to get some usage out of Five.
Jim, Thanks for explaining ZC's position re: FrankenZope or backporting
CA into Zope2.  One of the big questions that I believe is open is how to
use more of zope.app in Zope 2 - specifically Schema/Widgets.  I heard
that Zope Corp. is using this in some projects.

Note that FrankenZope is going to go for the new way of Interface 
integration last I heard (Five's way); the FrankenZope style setup to 
make interfaces work is not needed anymore since the changes to 
zope.interface that I did. This new approach works in straight 2.7.

I also heard rumors that FrankenZope's use of schema/widgets is actually 
an evolved branch of an earlier version of Zope 3. Five's mission is to 
integrate Zope 3 into Zope 2 as much a possible without having to change 
either. Of course this is not always possible, but it's an important 
goal. That said, I'm sure we could learn more from FrankenZope's 
experiences in that area if someone would to speak up about this.
Can we please stop using this name in writing?  It is funny, but not very
reassuring to outsiders. :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-19 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jim Fulton wrote:
Can we please stop using this name in writing?  It is funny, but not very
reassuring to outsiders. :)
What do we call this project then? :)
The Project-that-shall-not-be-named!
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-15 Thread alan runyan
 Alan, does that address your concerns?

 Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so
 there's nothing to adopt yet. :)  But I certainly encourage folks to
 participate and help Martijn figure out what the approach should be.

Raphael, I think its great that Jim responded. Now we (collectively)
need to get some usage out of Five.

Jim, Thanks for explaining ZC's position re: FrankenZope or backporting
CA into Zope2.  One of the big questions that I believe is open is how to
use more of zope.app in Zope 2 - specifically Schema/Widgets.  I heard
that Zope Corp. is using this in some projects.

So - I asked if people to do some CMF/Plone implementation of Views
in certain aspects.  I am up for creating a Supplement to Plone to bolts on
some of the technologies and uses it.  Maybe specifically using it for
doing in-place versioning.  I urge the communities to use Plone or maybe a
fork of it (or the CMF) to be a playground.  Like Idle forked to land some
major features for Python.  Then it can be integrated back into subsequent
projects.

-- 
Alan Runyan
Enfold Systems, LLC. - Principal
Plone/Zope Training, Products, and Consulting
http://www.enfoldsystems.com/
p. +1.713.942.2377
f. +1.832.201.8856


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-15 Thread Jim Fulton
alan runyan wrote:
Alan, does that address your concerns?

...
One of the big questions that I believe is open is how to
use more of zope.app in Zope 2 - specifically Schema/Widgets.  I heard
that Zope Corp. is using this in some projects.
I think we should not be squeemish about using zope.app. Widgets are
the main reason that we are using Zope 3 in Zope 2. I would like
to see most of the widget code get lifted up out of zope.app. This is
of general interest (not just z2).
So - I asked if people to do some CMF/Plone implementation of Views
in certain aspects.  I am up for creating a Supplement to Plone to bolts on
some of the technologies and uses it.  Maybe specifically using it for
doing in-place versioning.  I urge the communities to use Plone or maybe a
fork of it (or the CMF) to be a playground.  Like Idle forked to land some
major features for Python.  Then it can be integrated back into subsequent
projects.
I'll note that there is an opportinuty for CMF-based systems
that might not be interesting to Five. Specifically, the obvious fact
that the mechanisms in the CMF are similar to those in Zope 3.  It
should be possible to create a new kind of CMF layer that does view
lookup.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )