Re: [Zope-dev] Re: traversable methods / docstrings.

2006-01-30 Thread Dieter Maurer
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote at 2006-1-30 16:52 +0100: > ... >One extra difficulty when debugging with that model is that .pyc files >must be deleted if the .py is modified. since apparently docstrings are >ignored during the compilation. This is not the case (unless you use "-OO" and even then, th

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: traversable methods / docstrings.

2006-01-30 Thread Jean-Marc Orliaguet
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: I didn't know that methods needed to have docstrings to be traversable (it took me some time to find out why I was getting "Not found" errors on some of a tool's methods). Is there any reason to sti

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: traversable methods / docstrings.

2006-01-30 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Lennart Regebro schrieb: If somebody gets time to do the suggested refactoring of the publisher for 2.10, then the docstring requirement could be dropped for IFiveTraversable objects, I think. Otoh, whats wrong with docstrings anyway? :-) Regards Tino __

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: traversable methods / docstrings.

2006-01-30 Thread Lennart Regebro
If somebody gets time to do the suggested refactoring of the publisher for 2.10, then the docstring requirement could be dropped for IFiveTraversable objects, I think. or? ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/

[Zope-dev] Re: traversable methods / docstrings.

2006-01-30 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: > I didn't know that methods needed to have docstrings to be traversable > (it took me some time to find out why I was getting "Not found" errors > on some of a tool's methods). Is there any reason to still have such a > "fe