--On 30. August 2008 07:39:05 +0200 Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Previously Malthe Borch wrote:
Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
namespace definition (current z3c.pt behavior) or implicitly fallback to
the standard mappings (current zope.p
2008/8/30 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is correct for HTML PageTemplates; XML PageTemplates, too, require
> the namespace declarations -- at least this has been the case
> for the former Zope 2 version of "PageTemplate" (I do not yet
> know most details about the newer Zope 3 "PageTemp
Malthe Borch wrote at 2008-8-29 13:20 +0200:
> ...
>Right, so this is basically a question of whether the following
>template is legal or not:
>
>
>
>In ZPT it would be, because it automatically assumes this namespace
>declaration:
>
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> xmlns:tal="http://xml.
Previously Malthe Borch wrote:
> Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
> namespace definition (current z3c.pt behavior) or implicitly fallback to
> the standard mappings (current zope.pagetemplate behavior).
+1 for requiring proper XML namespace. Tools like xmlli
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:31:21PM +0200, Malthe Borch wrote:
> Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
> namespace definition (current z3c.pt behavior) or implicitly fallback to
> the standard mappings (current zope.pagetemplate behavior).
Requiring explicit XML na
--On 29. August 2008 13:20:38 +0200 Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/8/29 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--On 29. August 2008 12:31:21 +0200 Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
namespace definition (c
2008/8/29 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> --On 29. August 2008 12:31:21 +0200 Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
>> namespace definition (current z3c.pt behavior) or implicitly fallback to
>> the standard mappin
--On 29. August 2008 12:31:21 +0200 Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
namespace definition (current z3c.pt behavior) or implicitly fallback to
the standard mappings (current zope.pagetemplate behavior).
Can you elabo
Trying to get a feeling here on whether we want to require proper XML
namespace definition (current z3c.pt behavior) or implicitly fallback to
the standard mappings (current zope.pagetemplate behavior).
\malthe
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.
