Hi Sidnei
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] lxml and z3c.form strategy?
>
> What's the actual issue with lxml? It's not that hard to
> compile it (I'm the person that compiles the official
> releases), just a little bit under-documented.
We started to use lxml in
What's the actual issue with lxml? It's not that hard to compile it
(I'm the person that compiles the official releases), just a little
bit under-documented.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Roger Ineichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Malthe, Stephan
>
> I decided after along night, trying to com
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > I guess we have to figure out a clever way to make a special extra
> > requires for Python 2.4, since elementtree and cElementTree are available
> > in PyPI.
>
> Something like this in setup.py?:
>
> extra_requires = []
> import sys
> if sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> Is that ElementTree that was only included from Python 2.5? In other
>> words, z3c.pt + python2.4 - lxml = fail?
>
> I guess we have to figure out a clever way to make a
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Is that ElementTree that was only included from Python 2.5? In other
> words, z3c.pt + python2.4 - lxml = fail?
I guess we have to figure out a clever way to make a special extra requires
for Python 2.4, since elementtree and cElementTree ar
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:29:13PM +0200, Malthe Borch wrote:
> 2008/9/16 Roger Ineichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > That's fine for me. But the question is what happens on a
> > production server. Does the missing lxml end in useing
> > a slow fallback implementation or does it use the old
> > style
2008/9/16 Roger Ineichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What is the reason why z3c.* packages should use z3c.pt and fallback
> to a new concept rather then stay with PageTemplate if no lxml is
> installed and z3c.pt is useless?
There seems to be some confusion here, and I understand why this has
arisen, b
