RE: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Mohsen Moeeni
Quoting Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > No idea -- my personal SB filter spares me from seeing almost all junk email > from all sources, and I get a few hundred of them per day. By far the > biggest source is bounces to [EMAIL PROTECTED], due to viruses and spam > forged to appear as if sent

RE: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Tim Peters
[Ken Manheimer] > In either mode, essentially, list members would be able to get postings > to the list only from their registered account. Or accounts. When I've faced a list like this as a user, I've subscribed multiple times, once from each account I'm likely to post from, but set the "no deli

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Michael Bernstein
Ken Manheimer wrote: I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to swing it, requiring earnest volunteer effort. Here are the deta

RE: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Tim Peters wrote: [Ken Manheimer] I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to swing it, requiring earnest volu

RE: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Tim Peters
[Ken Manheimer] > I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to > follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the > current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to > swing it, requiring earnest volunteer effort. Here are the deta

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Andrew Sawyers
Ken Manheimer wrote: On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Andrew Sawyers wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: What proportion of the list traffic comes from valid members who are posting from alternate accounts? A huge percentage was - I don't know how much is making it through to the lists though. I'm hearing a lot of

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Andrew Sawyers wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: What proportion of the list traffic comes from valid members who are posting from alternate accounts? A huge percentage was - I don't know how much is making it through to the lists though. I'm hearing a lot of complaints from peopl

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Andrew Sawyers
Ken Manheimer wrote: What proportion of the list traffic comes from valid members who are posting from alternate accounts? A huge percentage was - I don't know how much is making it through to the lists though. I'm hearing a lot of complaints from people either third party, seeing it in IRC or

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Ken Manheimer
What proportion of the list traffic comes from valid members who are posting from alternate accounts? On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Andrew Sawyers wrote: Ken Manheimer wrote: I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Andrew Sawyers
Ken Manheimer wrote: I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to swing it, requiring earnest volunteer effort. Here are the deta

Re: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Ken Manheimer
I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to swing it, requiring earnest volunteer effort. Here are the details. Being the admin

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-24 Thread Andrew Sawyers
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: +1 for member-only posting On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 22:24, Tim Peters wrote: Over on the zope and zope-dev lists, there's currently agitation to make them members-only mailing lists. The point is that spam could not get thru then (unless posted by a member). What wo

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-23 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
+1 for member-only posting On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 22:24, Tim Peters wrote: > Over on the zope and zope-dev lists, there's currently agitation to make > them members-only mailing lists. The point is that spam could not get thru > then (unless posted by a member). > > What would zodb-dev members li

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-23 Thread Mohsen Moeeni
Quoting Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm the list admin for zodb-dev, and don't have a preference. If you do, > and it's strong enough to scream it, shout. The loudest screamer will win > . By default, I won't change the current policy (anyone can post > here, member or not). > As the pe

[Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies

2004-06-21 Thread Tim Peters
Over on the zope and zope-dev lists, there's currently agitation to make them members-only mailing lists. The point is that spam could not get thru then (unless posted by a member). What would zodb-dev members like? Posting by a list member would not be affected, unless you attempted to send a m