[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More important is the second point: Having such a tool would bring a
HUGE amount of value added to Zope. Mega, super huge.
Sounds like the opportunity for a commercial tool.
It's not NEEDED, but it makes life a LOT easier, and so would give any company
with it
!
J.F.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 6, 2004 3:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] How should an ideal Zope IDE look like?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Andre.
thanks ;-)
...
My main concern would be it's adaptibility to custom content types. If I
have my own Geospatial-ish content type, how would the IDE handle it ?
How would I go about making it handle it ? etc ...
Archetypes? But then much more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 24 Apr 2004 09:13, Andre Meyer wrote:
- Commenting/uncommenting code (any hope Python will ever offer
multi-line comments?).
'''
this_code_is_commented_out()
so_is_this()
'''
Well, there is certainly more, but this is a start... ;-)
It was not my expectation that you would go and implement all of this ;-)
Of course, this is a lot of work, but much has been done by others,
already. The wish list was intended as ideas for those capable and
willing to contribute. The value of good tools for any technology cannot
be
: April 24, 2004 5:24 PM
To: Aleks Totic
Cc: Martin Kretschmar; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] How should an ideal Zope IDE look like?
It was not my expectation that you would go and implement all of this ;-)
Of course, this is a lot of work, but much has been done by others,
already
Hi!
I am aware that I am adding another 2-3 man years to the wishlist, but here
are some ideas I had lately:
A Zope IDE should be much more than just a programming IDE adapted offer
highlighting etc. for Zope's languages. It should be an RAD tool similar to
what MS Access does for
On Saturday 24 April 2004 21:24, Joachim Werner wrote:
Forms (or more general, schemas), can be defined easily, either in a
Formulator-like way or graphically (i.e. you see the actual form fields on
the screen when working on the form).
This UI could be very easily built today using mutable
On Saturday 24 April 2004 21:24, Joachim Werner wrote:
All documentation about interfaces and APIs should be available wherever it
makes sense, e.g. I can query for all components that are registered for a
certain interface and view the interface definitions.
This tool already exists. Get a
So, I give it a try and submit a wish list for an ideal IDE for
Python/Zope.
Maybe some words about the IDEs I have been working with, so you can
track where the features I wish to have come from: I used CodeWarrior,
NetBeans, jEdit for both Java and Python/Zope, Boa Constructor and
Eclipse
Nice wishlist. About 3-4 man years worth of coding, 2 min is my
guess.
My goal is not quite so ambitious. I wanted to learn Eclipse
well. I was always jelaous of Emacs guys that could whip up a
mode for their favorite lanuguage. Implementing a Python IDE
sounded like a good starter project.
11 matches
Mail list logo
