Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
[snip]
It appears there is an assumption that merging Z2 and Z3 code within Z2
itself is an unmitigated good thing, but IMHO, each is complicated
enough in their own right that I'd personally prefer to be dealing with
one or the other at any given time and not both. This isn'
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Samstag, 19. März 2005 18:15 Uhr +0100 Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No debate with doing an alpha, though. There are likely to be more kinks
to be worked out indeed.
I have update the 2.8 wiki with the planned release schedule.
Thanks! Looks good. I'll com
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 12:23, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
[snip]
I assume these caveats are spelled out here because Z3 developers don't
want to slow down Z3 development to test/maintain Z2 compatibility. I
know a lot about Z2 code, but I know very little ab
