Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Feb 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Feb 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Feb 26 20:59:59 EST 2008
URL
Christian Theune wrote:
[snip]
Here's an idea:
Let `develop` trump version pinning, but not any other constraints.
As far as I can see this would allow both of our scenarios to work or
continue to work.
I'd be happy with that too, and was really what I was aiming at, and I
think it doesn't
Hi,
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
Christian Theune wrote:
[snip]
Here's an idea:
Let `develop` trump version pinning, but not any other constraints.
As far as I can see this would allow both of our scenarios to work or
continue to work.
I'd be happy with that too, and was really what I was aimi
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Christophe Combelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But probably the feature has been created before the name 'develop' was
> chosen,
> and it should have an other name ('egg_path'? 'local_egg'?).
source_egg?
--
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http:
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Martijn Faassen a écrit :
(...)
I think the term 'develop' is badly chosen. You are right if you argue
while having the meaning of 'develop' in mind. You are explaining what
you think a 'develop' option should be. A 'develop' option means: "I
want to 'develop' o
