Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Apr 18 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Apr 19 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Apr 18 20:58:44 EDT 2008
URL: http://m
Chris McDonough wrote:
I wonder if Philipp would be amenable to writing a proposal on this,
and get Chris McDonough's input.
IMO, a Zope2 egg release should depend on the following packages:
- 'ZODB3' (already packaged)
- 'transaction' (depended on by newer ZODBs)
- 'ZConfig' (also depended
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
can you elaborate with a few more sentences
why?
I could, but I'd rather not. I suggest reading:
http://mjg59.livejournal.com/84586.html
if you haven't already.
I concur with Jim - let's avoid ExtJS as their license is not clear.
When I studied th details of the
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
I wonder if Philipp would be amenable to writing a proposal on this,
and get Chris McDonough's input.
IMO, a Zope2 egg release should depend on the following packages:
- 'ZODB3' (already packaged)
- 'transaction' (depended on by newer Z
I'm thinking about volunteering for the zope2 section, but I already can say
that I'm not an expert on all facets of zope2. However, helping out is the
main concern now so something is better than nothing.
I'm doubting about what to write / have examples for etc., as you can do a
lot of zope3 tec
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
The second problem that might arise, is that the implicit assumption
that every object inside Zope 2 inherits from Acquisition base
classes no longer holds. Code that relies on the various aq_*
attributes to be there need to be adjusted to use t
Maerteijn wrote:
I'm thinking about volunteering for the zope2 section, but I already can say
that I'm not an expert on all facets of zope2. However, helping out is the
main concern now so something is better than nothing.
Absolutely. I don't think you need to be an expert to do a good job. In
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > can you elaborate with a few more sentences
> > > why?
> > >
> >
> > I could, but I'd rather not. I suggest reading:
> >
> > http://mjg59.livejournal.com/84586.html
> >
> > if you haven
