Am Mittwoch 22 Oktober 2008 00:03:51 schrieb Marius Gedminas:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:56:39PM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> > Just by chance, I pressed the reload button of my browser for quite some
> > time, so that my Zope3-based site was reloaded over and over. I was
> > surprised to
Previously Alexander J Smith wrote:
> I just tagged a 3.6.2 version with Sidnei's fix and pushed it to
> PyPI. However, the problem of depending on SVN 'trunk' externals is
> still present and will have to be addressed at some point.
Can you change the externals to use a revision pin? At leas
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Oct 21 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Oct 22 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Oct 21 20:56:11 EDT 2008
URL: http://m
Hermann Himmelbauer schrieb:
> Yes, I can reproduce this any time. But I looked into it further, and it's
> quite weird:
>
> - If I access the site without having logged in (= a new cookie/session is
> created), it does not happen.
> - If I login, pressing F5 rapidly triggers these warnings.
> -
What version of zope.session are you using?
A fix (using zope.minmax) for ConflictErrors related to the update of
access time on sessionData object was committed into zope.session in
rev76899. Not sure if that solves this problem of conflict errors that
you see, but if you are using a versio
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Adam GROSZER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems like 86460 breaks it.
>
> I have some idea why testrunner-coverage.txt does not detect this.
> I think it is doing coverage just on the tests code. There seems to be
> no "application"-like code. All code se
Hello Benji,
I think we solved that problem at the Blackforest sprint in Freiburg
with Roger. As I remember there are tests for that too.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 8:46:19 PM, you wrote:
BY> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Adam GROSZER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Seems like 86
Hi Benji, Adam
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.6.0 released
>
> Hello Benji,
>
> I think we solved that problem at the Blackforest sprint in
> Freiburg with Roger. As I remember there are tests for that too.
Yes, we solved the issue that the coverage feature
was loaded after the impo
Jim Fulton wrote:
> I would change it to just use getattr rather than hasattr.
>
> try:
> getattr(ob, name)
> except AttributeError:
> return False
> ...
Given the controversy about our original proposal, I think I'll just
implement Jim's suggestion. I'll do so as soon as possible.
--
