[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK

2009-05-22 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu May 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri May 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:01:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://

[Zope-dev] zope.app.component 3.8.2 release

2009-05-22 Thread Alexander J Smith
I released a new version of zope.app.component to fix a bug introduced in the recently deprecation of its metadirectives. Packages that were broken by this should use this new version. -- Alex Smith Software Engineer Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maill

[Zope-dev] zope.app.publisher 3.7.0 release

2009-05-22 Thread Alexander J Smith
I just released a new version of zope.app.publisher. The changes in this version are largely related to reducing dependencies on zope.app.component and zope.app.container. -- Alex Smith Software Engineer Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0 release?

2009-05-22 Thread David Glick
On May 21, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Malthe Borch wrote: > 2009/5/21 David Glick : >> Won't this cause problems if a z3c.form uses a template which calls >> a macro >> from a traditional Zope page template? That is, make it impossible >> to use >> z3c.form in a site that isn't using z3c.pt for ever

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.app.component 3.8.2 release

2009-05-22 Thread Martijn Faassen
Alexander J Smith wrote: > I released a new version of zope.app.component to fix a bug introduced > in the recently deprecation of its metadirectives. Packages that were > broken by this should use this new version. Oops: sorry for the breakage and thanks very much for the fix! Regards, Marti

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.app.publication dependencies (volunteers needed!)

2009-05-22 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, Chris McDonough wrote: [snip] > I tried to go after this today (reversing the dependency setup between > zope.formlib and zope.app.form). There are hundreds of changes that need to > be > made to move interfaces to zope.formlib. I made them (more or less > mechanically) but then couldn'

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.app.publisher 3.7.0 release

2009-05-22 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, Alexander J Smith wrote: > I just released a new version of zope.app.publisher. The changes in > this version are largely related to reducing dependencies on > zope.app.component and zope.app.container. Thanks very much for doing this work! I could actually remove the (direct) test-depen

[Zope-dev] package dependency refactoring progress report

2009-05-22 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hi there, This is a progress report on the package dependency refactoring work. We've had a lot of people contribute to this process (thanks everybody!), and bit by bit we are able to make a serious impact on dependencies. Yay! Let's take for example zope.app.publisher, which a few weeks ago h

Re: [Zope-dev] package dependency refactoring progress report

2009-05-22 Thread Chris McDonough
On 5/22/09 1:11 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: > After some work we'd gotten it down to this: > > http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles2.svg > > And by now the main cycles left are these: > > http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles3.svg > > So, the only dependency

[Zope-dev] zope.mimetype 1.1.2 release

2009-05-22 Thread Alexander J Smith
I just released a new version of zope.mimetype. This version no longer depends on zope.app.component directly. -- Alex Smith Software Engineer Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev *

Re: [Zope-dev] package dependency refactoring progress report

2009-05-22 Thread Shane Hathaway
Chris McDonough wrote: > On 5/22/09 1:11 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: >> After some work we'd gotten it down to this: >> >> http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles2.svg >> >> And by now the main cycles left are these: >> >> http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles3.

[Zope-dev] Another OFS.Traversable and ZPublisher inconsistency

2009-05-22 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi, So, we determined that OFS.Traversable's unrestrictedTraverse() shouldn't grow support for IPublishTraverse, which is fair enough. We're now using an ITraversable adapter instead (++namespace++). However, we found another inconsistency. In URL traversal, this works: /foo/bar/++namespace+

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0 release?

2009-05-22 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello Malthe, The problem that I see here with lxml is that it is used for output checking. Even worse z3c.form requires at least 2.1.1 of lxml, where KGS 3.4 has lxml nailed at 1.3.6. This burpes already on buildout. Now even if I would ignore this requirement for testing, (and testing) how could