I am wondering why the z3c.form radio widget appends :list to the names
of the generated input elements. Since a radio list can never have more
than one option selected I can't see any reason to do that. Does anyone
know this is done?
Wichert.
___
Zop
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Apr 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from ct at gocept.com.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 707 projects
From: ct at gocept
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> So this is still in pyexpat C code as far as I can tell. :-(
This is saddening.
I've not managed a 64-bit sandbox, which I suspect is what I really
need to debug that. Will shoot for this weekend, since last didn't
pan out.
-Fred
--
Le mardi 6 avril 2010 18:54:24, Jim Fulton a écrit :
> Is there a document you can point to that provide a description of the
> approach used?
A document is in the works, in the while I'll try to describe the architecture
briefly (should be readable to people knowing a bit about TPC) and give som
Fred Drake wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Martin Aspeli
> wrote:
>> So this is still in pyexpat C code as far as I can tell. :-(
>
> This is saddening.
But on the other hand, your dedication in helping me find a fix is
heartening. ;)
> I've not managed a 64-bit sandbox, which I susp
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Le mardi 6 avril 2010 18:54:24, Jim Fulton a écrit :
>> Is there a document you can point to that provide a description of the
>> approach used?
>
> A document is in the works, in the while I'll try to describe the architecture
> briefly (
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> I have a slight suspicion that lxml is involved somewhere. I've managed
> to make it crash reliably simply by doing a parse of an XML file, and I
> think such a parse may be happening as a side effect of a module import
> caused by that very Z
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looks like SVN and viewcvs weren't responding for a couple minutes. I
> could log into the machine via SSH and Apache serving docs.zope.org
> still worked.
>
> I only noticed:
>
> 27059 simon 20 0 98664 6388
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
> I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
> can't even get top to run on it this morning. Any clues about what is
> causing the load?
I haven't watched it because I don't know when The
On 4/7/10 17:14 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
>> can't even get top to run on it this morning. Any clues about what is
>> causing the load?
On 4/7/10 17:17 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 4/7/10 17:14 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
>>> can't even get top to run on it this morn
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> looks like SVN and viewcvs weren't responding for a couple minutes. I
>> could log into the machine via SSH and Apache serving docs.zope.org
>> still work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:27 , Jim Fulton wrote:
> We've been having some networking issues over the last week or two that
> we believe to have been addressed.
I'm still getting alerts from Nagios 2-3 times a day caused by high
packet loss and inability to connect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I woul like for the checkouts made to test repository policy should use
the '--ignore-externals' flag, because the code brought in as externals
is either checked separately, or else corresponds to a (non-checked) tag.
Tres.
- --
=
On 04/07/2010 05:44 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I woul like for the checkouts made to test repository policy should use
> the '--ignore-externals' flag, because the code brought in as externals
> is either checked separately, or else corresponds to a
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/7/10 17:27 , Jim Fulton wrote:
>> We've been having some networking issues over the last week or two that
>> we believe to have been addressed.
>
> I'm still getting alerts from Nagios
On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:33 PM, David Glick wrote:
> I also need to make some updates to make zc.authorizedotnet work with
> Python 2.6, as it currently depends (via zc.ssl) on ssl-for-setuptools, which
> is a backport of the ssl module that ships with Python 2.6.
You will not need to make those upda
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:35 PM, David Glick wrote:
> Understood. Now that Plone 4 is almost ready and using Python 2.6,
> there are a number of Plone GetPaid users who are ready to use these
> changes as soon as they're released. :)
zc.ssl-1.2 and zc.authorizedotnet-1.3.1 have been tagged and release
environment variable support for zc.buildout, including extends!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zc.buildout/+bug/557769
works for me so far
--
Florian Friesdorf
GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367
Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net
OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118
On 04/08/2010 04:27 AM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> environment variable support for zc.buildout, including extends!
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zc.buildout/+bug/557769
>
> works for me so far
Uhm ... interesting. I never noticed our recipe not to work with
extends. Can you give me an example?
On 04/07/2010 05:14 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
>> can't even get top to run on it this morning. Any clues about what is
>> causing the
21 matches
Mail list logo
