Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Jul 19 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Jul 20 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 54 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 17 from buildbot at
winbot.zope.org, 13 from ccomb at free.fr, 13 from
Hi everyone,
here's the Doodle for our next bug day:
http://www.doodle.com/6gydequztpac3xud
I'd like to see many people there, so if you have any questions that
need answering before you can join us on the bug day: ask them!
Christian
--
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh co. kg
Hi,
I just rejected issue
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/zope.app.testing/+bug/181754
There might be room for different oppinions and if anyone would like to
veto the decision, I'd welcome a discussion.
Christian
--
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstraße 29
On 2010-7-20 17:39, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I just rejected issue
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/zope.app.testing/+bug/181754
There might be room for different oppinions and if anyone would like to
veto the decision, I'd welcome a discussion.
Your rejection contains an assumption that
On 07/20/2010 06:01 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-7-20 17:39, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I just rejected issue
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/zope.app.testing/+bug/181754
There might be room for different oppinions and if anyone would like to
veto the decision, I'd welcome a
I'd like to put down some effort this week during the EuroPython
sprint to go forward with zope.testing for Python 3. zope.testing
3.9.5 is already deprecating zope.testing.testrunner, but I need to
remove it so that I can port zope.testing to Python 3 without going
mad. (zope.testrunner runs on
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 16:58, Jonathan Lange j...@mumak.net wrote:
Actually, it turned out to be something of a pebkac.
Happy to hear it, zope.testrunner and zope.testing.testrunner *should*
be compatible, and if they aren't that is probably a bug.
--
Lennart Regebro:
On 2010-7-20 18:15, Christian Theune wrote:
At least, WRT this bug, I don't think it's a good idea to ask explicitly
for bad requests to go to the application as the test layer should model
real server behaviour as closely as possible. And again it wouldn't make
sense anyway as you can't pass
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:57, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I'm for two separate releases. Release early, release often.
Oh, that's not a problem.
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/branches/regebro-400 Is
testrunner free and runs on Python 3 already. It's purely a question
On 07/20/2010 07:28 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-7-20 18:15, Christian Theune wrote:
At least, WRT this bug, I don't think it's a good idea to ask explicitly
for bad requests to go to the application as the test layer should model
real server behaviour as closely as possible. And again
On 07/21/2010 06:40 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:57, Marius Gedminasmar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I'm for two separate releases. Release early, release often.
Oh, that's not a problem.
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/branches/regebro-400 Is
testrunner free and
* Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net [2010-07-20 19:28]:
On 2010-7-20 18:15, Christian Theune wrote:
At least, WRT this bug, I don't think it's a good idea to ask explicitly
for bad requests to go to the application as the test layer should model
real server behaviour as closely as possible.
12 matches
Mail list logo
