This may seem like a redundant question, but this is the third time I've come
across the desire to be able to store values persistantly as lists or
dictionaries. I've read all the suggestions in the archives pointing out
alternatives (, TinyTable,
string.split('value1|value2|..', '|'), "lines"
like wrapping a gag around code if I don't have to,
and I'd rather this stuff be written to an install log or something.
I-see-a-fishbowl-proposal-for-a-new-installer-ly yours,
Eron
On Thursday 17 January 2002 12:23 pm, you wrote:
> Sure, go ahead!
>
> ----- Original Mes
st people won't know about this bug, and it's too
small (and premature) to be a hotfix.
I should have something by the end of the weekend.
Eron
On Friday 18 January 2002 02:25 pm, you wrote:
> Eron Lloyd wrote:
> >Chris (or anybody else),
> >
> >Have you tried to in
Yeah, this is something I'd be very interested in knowing, too. In fact,
this particular ability could make or break a community project I'm
going to be developing with Zope in the near future. Do you mean like
the pluggable access that ZServer provides? I imagine there would also
have to be some
just shelve in the Standard Library. Gadfly is ok to begin a
prototype in, but frustrating once you quickly hit a glass ceiling in
functionality. I'm interested in seeing how well it can scale, versus
Postgres, however. Any experience?
Thanks for the info,
Eron Lloyd
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 20
The problem here seems to be that you are trying to do XML-RPC communication
with a version of Zope that doesn't support XML-RPC out of the box. You
should use a version >= 2.4.0 to get this to work. From the output you sent
below, it looks like you're trying to invoke an RPC method call agains
Zope thinks you're trying to use an ancient version of DTML. Make sure
your comments are syntactically correct () and try to
avoid using anywhere as this could trip you up down
the road. That format for variable insertion is still supported for
legacy reasons.
Regards,
Eron
On Thu, 2002-04-11
I believe what is trying to be explained is that ZPT provides a certain
sequence for attribute *processing*, which begins *after* the template
is parsed (like unordered keyword arguments in Python). How they are
ordered in the source file is irrelevant, but by ordering them in the
precise way they
I think this is a great idea. A good way to start would be to have a tab
on the Control Panel entitles "Updates", that would make some XML-RPC
calls to Zope.org, and provide update and hotfix information when
compared against your running server. Of course, how we know what is
available is a good
ting. It would be fairly straightfoward to get that running again I
> believe if anyone wants to take a gander.
> --
> Andy McKay
> Agmweb Consulting
> http://www.agmweb.ca
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eron Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
--
Eron Lloy
Ooh! I've been thinking about something like this as well; PyQt would
definately be the way to go. The backend should be de-coupled from the UI, of
course.
Getting the gears turning,
Eron
On Friday 07 February 2003 12:47 am, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Zope-Dev'ers,
>
> Just for fun, I made a mock
://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>
> ___
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/lis
13 matches
Mail list logo